Citation network
illinois Vs. Wardlow
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 02, 1999
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 119 (1999) October Term, 1999 Syllabus Illinois V. WardlowSearch
-
reversing, the State Appellate Court found that Nolan did not have reasonable suspicion to make the stop under Terry v. OhioSearch
-
see Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
relevant in determining whether the circumstances are sufficiently suspicious to warrant further investigation, Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Nervous, evasive behavior is another pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion, e. g., United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
be based on commonsense judgments and inferences about human behavior. See 120 Syllabus United States v. CortezSearch
-
criminal activity, and, therefore, in investigating further. Such a holding is consistent with the decision in Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
because Officer Nolan did not have reasonable suspicion sufficient to justify an investigative stop pursuant to Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
a reasonable suspicion justifying a Terry stop. 183 Ill. 2d, at 310, 701 N. E. 2d, at 486. Relying on Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
the Fourth Amendment requires at least a minimal level of objective justification for making the stop. United States v. SokolowSearch
-
have differed on whether unprovoked flight is sufficient grounds to constitute reasonable suspicion. See, e. g., State v. AndersonSearch
-
Platt v. StateSearch
-
Harris v. StateSearch
-
State v. HicksSearch
-
State v. TuckerSearch
-
People v. ShabazSearch
-
People v. WilsonSearch
-
alone, is not enough to support a reasonable, particularized suspicion that the person is committing a crime. Brown v. TexasSearch
-
among the relevant contextual considerations in a Terry analysis. Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
recognized that nervous, evasive behavior is a pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSearch
-
of reasonable suspicion must be based on commonsense judgments and inferences about human behavior. See United States v. CortezSearch
-
and, therefore, in investigating further. Such a holding is entirely consistent with our decision in Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
police can never, by itself, be sufficient to justify a temporary investigative stop of the kind authorized by Terry v. OhioSearch
-
the specific facts of this case, I shall comment on the parties' requests for a per se rule. I In Terry v. OhioSearch
-
contact with the police or move from one place to another-as he or she has a right to do (and do rapidly). See Chicago v. MoralesSearch
-
to account for the experiences of many citizens of this country, particularly those who are minorities. See California v. HodariSearch
-
supporting reasonable suspicion. United States v. CortezSearch
-
Alberty v. UnitedSearch
-
Hickory v. UnitedSearch
-
is a fact too generic and susceptible to innocent explanation to satisfy the reasonable suspicion inquiry. See Brown v. TexasSearch
-
of STEVENS, J. It is the State's burden to articulate facts sufficient to support reasonable suspicion. Brown v. TexasSearch
-
see also Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
Syllabus Illinois V. WardlowSearch
-
Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Syllabus United States v. CortezSearch
-
State v. AndersonSearch
-
Brown v. TexasSearch
-
See United States v. CortezSearch
-
I In Terry v. OhioSearch
-
See Chicago v. MoralesSearch
-
See California v. HodariSearch
-
See Brown v. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial