Citation network
Baker Vs. General Motors Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 13, 1998
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Baker v. GeneralSearch
-
Motors Corp. - 522 U.S. 222 (1998) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Baker Et Al. V. GeneralSearch
-
governed by the judgment, qualifies for recognition throughout the land. See, e. g., Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSearch
-
in determining the law applicable to a controversy, see Nevada v. HallSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to the full faith and credit due judgments, see, e. g., Estin v. EstinSearch
-
money have long been considered equivalent to judgments at law entitled to nationwide recognition. See, e. g., Barber v. BarberSearch
-
such measures remain subject to the evenhanded control of forum law. See McElmoyle ex rel. Bailey v. CohenSearch
-
of that other State or interfered with litigation over which the ordering State had no authority. See, e. g., Fall v. EastinSearch
-
power over those parties, and no basis for commanding them to become intervenors in the Elwell-GM dispute. See Martin v. WilksSearch
-
in a lawsuit brought by parties who were not subject to the jurisdiction of the Michigan court. Cf. United States v. NixonSearch
-
Elwell v. GeneralSearch
-
Id., at 277. See also Estin v. EstinSearch
-
Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. IndustrialSearch
-
since then, the command for full faith and credit to judgments has remained constant. 233 Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSearch
-
other words, the judgment of the rendering State gains nationwide force. See, e. g., Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSearch
-
Kremer v. ChemicalSearch
-
use of the plain English terms claim and issue preclusion in lieu of res judicata and collateral estoppel, see Migra v. WarrenSearch
-
State's decree concerning land ownership in another State has been held ineffective to transfer title, see Fall v. EastinSearch
-
rights and obligations running between the par ties to the foreign litigation, see, e. g., Robertson v. HowardSearch
-
litigation elsewhere, even if compatible with due process as a direction constraining parties to the decree, see Cole v. CunninghamSearch
-
in fact have not controlled the second court's actions regarding litigation in that court. See, e. g., James v. GrandSearch
-
an injunction, in any event, are generally administered by the court that issued the injunction. See, e. g., Stiller v. HardmanSearch
-
Court has held it impermissible for a state court to enjoin a party from proceeding in a federal court, see Donovan v. DallasSearch
-
be invoked against one who did not participate in the prior adjudication. See BlonderTongue Laboratories, Inc. v. UniversitySearch
-
and he cannot sue again to recover more. See Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSearch
-
cf. Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. FirstSearch
-
a judgment do not travel with the judgment itself for purposes of full faith and credit, see McElmoyle ex rel. Bailey v. CohenSearch
-
and just as one State's judgment cannot automatically transfer title to land in another State, see Fall v. EastinSearch
-
of Elwell's testimony, the Bakers would of course be precluded from relitigating that issue in Missouri. See Cromwell v. CountySearch
-
decree cannot command obedience elsewhere on a matter the Michigan court lacks authority to resolve. See Thomas v. WashingtonSearch
-
Bailey v. CohenSearch
-
Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
U. S. 183, 187 (1901) (quoting McElmoyle, supra, at 325). See, e. g., Watts v. WaddleSearch
-
even when the law underlying those judgments contravenes the public policy of the second State. See, e. g., Estin v. EstinSearch
-
Williams v. NorthSearch
-
Syllabus Baker Et Al. V. GeneralSearch
-
Nevada v. HallSearch
-
Bailey v. CohenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial