Citation network
Gray Vs. Maryland
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 09, 1998
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 185 (1998) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Gray V. MarylandSearch
-
against Bell, not Gray. The jury convicted both defendants. Maryland's intermediate appellate court held that Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
of the evidence cannot be allowed. See 391 U. S., at 135-136. Bruton's scope was limited by Richardson v. MarshSearch
-
whereas this Court has assumed that such identifiers fall inside Bruton's protection, see Harrington v. CaliforniaSearch
-
JUSTICE BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. The issue in this case concerns the application of Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
rule applies to the redacted confession before us, we must consider both Bruton and a later case, Richardson v. MarshSearch
-
insulated from crossexamination, violated Bruton's Sixth Amendment rights. Id., at 135. In Richardson v. MarshSearch
-
United States v. DelliSearch
-
Paoli, 229 F.2d 319 , 321 (CA2 1956), aff'd, 352 U. S. 232 (1957), overruled by Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 391 U. S. 123 (1968). See also Malinski v. NewSearch
-
United States v. GrinnellSearch
-
however, that nicknames and specific descriptions fall inside, not outside, Bruton's protection. See Harrington v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
We also note that several Circuits have interpreted Bruton similarly for many years, see, e. g., United States v. GarciaSearch
-
Clark v. MaggioSearch
-
JUSTICE SCALIA, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE, JusTICE KENNEDY, and JUSTICE THOMAS join, dissenting. In Richardson v. MarshSearch
-
of Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
dissent. The almost invariable assumption of the law is that jurors follow their instructions. Francis v. FranklinSearch
-
convictions for the purpose of sentencing enhancement, or statements elicited from a defendant in violation of Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
long as the jury is instructed that such evidence may not be considered for the purpose of determining guilt. Spencer v. TexasSearch
-
Harris v. NewSearch
-
physical description that clearly identifies the defendant (which we have assumed Bruton covers, see Harrington v. CaliforniaSearch
-
the increase in its complexity) posed by the approval of such IThe Court is mistaken to suggest that in Richardson v. MarshSearch
-
method of redaction. See ante, at 197. There the parties agreed to the method of redaction, App. in Richardson v. MarshSearch
-
Ogonowski v. StateSearch
-
Syllabus Gray V. MarylandSearch
-
Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
Harrington v. CaliforniaSearch
-
In Richardson v. MarshSearch
-
Malinski v. NewSearch
-
See Harrington v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Francis v. FranklinSearch
-
of Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
Spencer v. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial