Citation network
Forney Vs. Apfel
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1998
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 266 (1998) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Forney V. ApfelSearch
-
and ordinarily can appeal a decision granting in part and denying in part the remedy requested, United States v. JoseSearch
-
see generally Bowen v. YuckertSearch
-
Forney v. SecretarySearch
-
and it is, therefore, appealable. Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSearch
-
see also Shalala v. SchaeferSearch
-
Ibid. (citing Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSearch
-
Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank v. RoperSearch
-
United States v. JoseSearch
-
find a right to appeal in roughly comparable circumstances. See Brief for Respondent 21, n. 12 (citing Gargoyles, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Castle v. RubinSearch
-
La Plante v. AmericanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Graziano v. HarrisonSearch
-
Ragen Corp. v. KearneySearch
-
Carrigan v. ExxonSearch
-
see, e. g., Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
see also CH2M Hill Central, Inc. v. HermanSearch
-
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. BathSearch
-
Syllabus Forney V. ApfelSearch
-
Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSearch
-
Gargoyles, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Parr v. UnitedSearch
-
CH2M Hill Central, Inc. v. HermanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial