Citation network
Hohn Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1998
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hohn v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 524 U.S. 236 (1998) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Hohn V. UnitedSearch
-
under this Court's intervening decision in Bailey v. UnitedSearch
-
as used in a statute, means a court proceeding, suit, or action, Blyew v. UnitedSearch
-
federal judge's actions performed in an administrative, as opposed to a judicial, capacity, see, e. g., United States v. FerreiraSearch
-
and Automobile Workers v. ScofieldSearch
-
purposes, see, e. g., Kawaauhau v. GeigerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
limitation on certiorari review of denials of appealability certificate applications, see, e. g., Bates v. UnitedSearch
-
important and meritorious claims such as Hohn's. Although the decision directly conflicts with the portion of House v. MayoSearch
-
counts. Hohn did not challenge the instruction in his direct appeal, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. United States v. HohnSearch
-
c)(1) required active employment of the firearm. Proximity and accessibility alone were not sufficient. Bailey v. UnitedSearch
-
the courts of appeals. Nixon v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
Blyew v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ApkerSearch
-
capacity. When judges perform administrative functions, their decisions are not subject to our review. United States v. FerreiraSearch
-
see also Gordon v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S., at 24. We reached a similar conclusion in Nixon v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
of law sufficient to bring the case within the collateral order doctrine announced in Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
see also United States v. NixonSearch
-
The filing of a proper notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. Torres v. OaklandSearch
-
United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
the requirements for an extraordinary writ and without suggesting our lack of jurisdiction to do so. E. g., Houston v. LackSearch
-
Fallen v. UnitedSearch
-
Leishman v. AssociatedSearch
-
of Appeals in proceedings to review the decision of an administra- 248 tive agency. Automobile Workers v. ScofieldSearch
-
have long treated appeals of dismissals for improper venue as cases in the courts of appeals, see, e. g., Radzanower v. ToucheSearch
-
Brunette Machine Works, Ltd. v. KockumSearch
-
Schnell v. PeterSearch
-
Fourco Glass Co. v. TransmirraSearch
-
Mis- 249 sissippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSearch
-
those cases, however, was the interlocutory nature of the appeal, not the absence of a proper case. Lauro Lines s.r.l. v. ChasserSearch
-
Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSearch
-
We are reluctant to adopt a construction making another statutory provision superfluous. See, e. g., Kawaauhau v. GeigerSearch
-
United States v. MenascheSearch
-
instance would have been just as explicit in denying it in the other, were that its intention. See, e. g., Bates v. UnitedSearch
-
presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion''') (quoting Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
remedies. Our decision, we must acknowledge, is in direct conflict with the portion of our decision in House v. MayoSearch
-
Patterson v. McLeanSearch
-
less constrained to follow precedent where, as here, the opinion was rendered without full briefing or argument. Gray v. MississippiSearch
-
U. S. 648 , 651, n. 1 (1987) (questioning the precedential value of Davis v. GeorgiaSearch
-
a rule of procedure that does not alter primary conduct. And what is more, the rule of procedure announced in House v. MayoSearch
-
these examples are several noteworthy decisions which resolved significant issues of federal law. See, e. g., Allen v. HardySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial