Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections Vs. Yeskey

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 15, 1998

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

29 entries 7 linked 22 unlinked
Show
  1. Procunier Vs. Martinez US Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1974
    Distinguished
  2. Preiser Vs. Rodriguez US Supreme Court · May 07, 1973
    Distinguished
  3. Hudson Vs. Palmer US Supreme Court · Jul 03, 1984
  4. Olim Vs. Wakinekona US Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1983
  5. Gregory Vs. Ashcroft US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1991
  6. Thornburgh Vs. Abbott US Supreme Court · May 15, 1989
  7. City of Boerne Vs. Flores US Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1997
  8. U.S. 206 (1998) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Et Al. V. Yeskey
    Search
  9. B). Unlike the situation that obtained in Gregory v. Ashcroft
    Search
  10. And for the N a- 208 208 Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections V. Yeskey
    Search
  11. Petitioners argue that state prisoners are not covered by the ADA for the same reason we held in Gregory v. Ashcroft
    Search
  12. U. S. 396 , 412 (1974), overruled on other grounds, Thornburgh v. Abbott
    Search
  13. See Block v. Rutherford
    Search
  14. for example, is a service (and the use of it an activity), which prisoners are free to take or leave. Cf. Gabel v. Lynaugh
    Search
  15. In Such Critical 212 212 Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections V. Yeskey
    Search
  16. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex
    Search
  17. Attorney General v. Delaware
    Search
  18. Trainmen v. Baltimore
    Search
  19. ADA to state prisons is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power under either the Commerce Clause, compare Printz v. United
    Search
  20. States, 521 U. S. 898 (1997), with Garcia v. San
    Search
  21. of the Fourteenth Amendment, see City of Boerne v. Flores
    Search
  22. H. Kress & Co., 398 U. S. 144 , 147, n. 2 (1970) (citations omitted). See also Dothard v. Rawlinson
    Search
  23. Duignan v. United
    Search
  24. Syllabus Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Et Al. V. Yeskey
    Search
  25. Cf. Gabel v. Lynaugh
    Search
  26. Attorney General v. Delaware
    Search
  27. Printz v. United
    Search
  28. Garcia v. San
    Search
  29. Dothard v. Rawlinson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial