Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Marquez Vs. Screen Actors

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Oct 05, 1998

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

51 entries 4 linked 47 unlinked
Show
  1. Vaca Vs. Sipes US Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1967
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council Vs. Garmon US Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1957
  3. Pattern Makers Vs. Nlrb US Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1985
  4. Ford Motor Co. Vs. Huffman US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1953
  5. Marquez v. Screen
    Search
  6. Actors - 525 U.S. 33 (1998) October Term, 1998 Syllabus Marquez V. Screen
    Search
  7. condition merely by paying to the union an amount equal to its initiation fees and dues, NLRB v. General
    Search
  8. are not germane to collective bargaining, grievance adjustment, or contract administration, Communications Workers v. Beck
    Search
  9. s conduct toward a member of the bargaining unit is arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith. E. g., Vaca v. Sipes
    Search
  10. so far outside a wide range of reasonableness that it is wholly irrational or arbitrary. See, e. g., Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
    Search
  11. is within the NLRB's primary jurisdiction, San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  12. but a claim alleging a breach of the duty of fair representation is cognizable in federal court, e. g., Vaca v. Sipes
    Search
  13. that a union can require is the payment of fees and dues, NLRB v. General
    Search
  14. used for collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment activities, Communications Workers v. Beck
    Search
  15. of a union as a condition of employment. See Communications Workers v. Beck
    Search
  16. a)(3), and two of our conclusions about the language of that subsection bear directly on this case. First, in NLRB v. General
    Search
  17. Motors Corp., supra, at 742-743 (citing Radio Officers v. NLRB
    Search
  18. merely by paying to the union an amount equal to the union's initiation fees and dues. See also Pattern Makers v. NLRB
    Search
  19. NLRB v. General
    Search
  20. Motors Corp., supra, at 742. Second, in Communications Workers v. Beck
    Search
  21. Id., at 1038-1039 (citing International Union Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers v. NLRB
    Search
  22. Nielsen v. International
    Search
  23. Bloom v. NLRB
    Search
  24. plaintiff's attempt to disguise an unfair labor practice claim as a fair representation claim, Communications Workers v. Beck
    Search
  25. Paperworkers Int'l Union (Weyerhaeuser Paper), 320 N. L. R. B. 349 (1995), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Buzenius v. NLRB
    Search
  26. Works, 320 N. L. R. B. 224 (1995), enf'd sub nom. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. NLRB
    Search
  27. F.3d 1012 (CA7), cert. denied sub nom. Strang v. NLRB
    Search
  28. post, p. 813. See also Nielsen v. International
    Search
  29. Abrams v. Communications
    Search
  30. the exclusive representative of the employees in the unit, to represent all members fairly. See, e. g., Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
    Search
  31. U. S. 171 , 177 (1967). As we described this duty in Vaca v. Sipes
    Search
  32. of the bargaining unit is arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith. I d., at 190. See also Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
    Search
  33. U. S., at 78 (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman
    Search
  34. can be heard in federal court. Brief for Petitioner 24-25. For this proposition, petitioner relies on Breininger v. Sheet
    Search
  35. this challenge is within the primary jurisdiction of the NLRB. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  36. a breach of the duty of fair representation, this claim is cognizable in the first instance in federal court. Vaca v. Sipes
    Search
  37. Breininger v. Sheet
    Search
  38. for a decision on the plaintiff's duty of fair representation claim. Ibid. (quoting Connell Constr. Co. v. Plumbers
    Search
  39. by members of the National Labor Relations Board, language like this can facilitate deception. See, e. g., Bloom v. NLRB
    Search
  40. Wegscheid v. Local
    Search
  41. Syllabus Marquez V. Screen
    Search
  42. Communications Workers v. Beck
    Search
  43. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill
    Search
  44. See Communications Workers v. Beck
    Search
  45. Radio Officers v. NLRB
    Search
  46. International Union Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers v. NLRB
    Search
  47. Buzenius v. NLRB
    Search
  48. International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. NLRB
    Search
  49. Strang v. NLRB
    Search
  50. of the NLRB. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial