Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Walters Vs. Metropolitan Ed. Enterprises, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 14, 1997

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 1 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. Vs. Darden US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1992
  2. Walters v. Metropolitan
    Search
  3. ED. Enterprises, Inc. - 519 U.S. 202 (1997) October Term, 1996 Syllabus Walters V. Metropolitan
    Search
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Metropolitan
    Search
  5. for the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law by Lawrence J. 204 204 WALTERS v. METROPOLITAN
    Search
  6. The District Court granted Metropolitan's motion to dismiss, 864 F. Supp. 71 (ND Ill. 1994), relying on Zimmerman v. North
    Search
  7. a), by failing to promote her to 206 206 WALTERS v. METROPOLITAN
    Search
  8. actually compensating the individual on that day. This position has also been adopted by the Eighth Circuit. See EEOC v. Gar
    Search
  9. s appearance on the employer's payroll. The payroll method was approved in dictum by the Fifth Circuit in Dumas v. Mount
    Search
  10. Vernon, 612 F.2d 974 , 979, n. 7 (1980), and was adopted by the First Circuit in Thurber v. Jack
    Search
  11. see also Vera-Lozano v. International
    Search
  12. EEOC v. Arabian
    Search
  13. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick
    Search
  14. O Possess, as 208 208 Walters V. Metropolitan
    Search
  15. superfluous. Statutes must be interpreted, if possible, to give each word some operative effect. United States v. Menasche
    Search
  16. elimination of evident ambiguity is ample-indeed, admirable-justification for the inclusion 210 210 WALTERS v. METROPOLITAN
    Search
  17. under traditional principles of agency law, see, e. g., Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden
    Search
  18. U. S. 318 , 323-324 (1992), would not count toward the 15-employee minimum. 212 212 WALTERS v. METROPOLITAN
    Search
  19. Syllabus Walters V. Metropolitan
    Search
  20. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Metropolitan
    Search
  21. Zimmerman v. North
    Search
  22. the Eighth Circuit. See EEOC v. Gar
    Search
  23. Dumas v. Mount
    Search
  24. Thurber v. Jack
    Search
  25. Vera-Lozano v. International
    Search
  26. United States v. Menasche
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial