Citation network
Auer Vs. Robbins
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 19, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 452 (1997) October Term, 1996 Syllabus Aver Et Al. V. RobbinsSearch
-
the statutory exemption's scope. See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
procedural objection to the Secretary's failure to amend the disciplinary-deduction rule in the wake of Garcia v. SanSearch
-
and thus is controlling. Robertson v. MethowSearch
-
for the Labor Policy Association by Sandra J. Boyd and Daniel V. YagerSearch
-
Arthur A. Hartinger, Louise H. Renne, and Jonathan v. HoltzmanSearch
-
for Eleventh Amendment purposes. Hess v. PortSearch
-
Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. TahoeSearch
-
Stat. 58-62, and in 1985 we held that this exercise of power was consistent with the Tenth Amendment, Garcia v. SanSearch
-
Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U. S. 528 (1985) (overruling National League of Cities v. UserySearch
-
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
pay deductions on individuals employed in genuine executive, administrative, or professional capacities. Mueller v. ReichSearch
-
veritable flood of post-Garcia litigation against public employers in this area, see, e. g., Car penter v. DenverSearch
-
Bankston v. IllinoisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Shockley v. NewportSearch
-
The requirement of actual deductions was also imposed in an earlier ruling by the Eighth Circuit, McDonnell v. OmahaSearch
-
denied, 510 U. S. 1163 (1994), and in an Eleventh Circuit case, Atlanta Professional Firefighters Union, Local 134 v. AtlantaSearch
-
supra, at 805. Other Circuits have rejected the requirement, Yourman v. DinkinsSearch
-
Carpenter v. DenverSearch
-
Kinney v. DistrictSearch
-
Abshire v. CountySearch
-
only in the face of vagueness or ambiguity in the governing policy, Michigan Assn. of Governmental Employees v. MichiganSearch
-
and unanticipated overtime liability (including the possibility of substantial liquidated damages, see, e. g., Kinney v. DistrictSearch
-
Robertson v. MethowSearch
-
Valley Citizens Council, 490 U. S. 332 , 359 (1989) (quoting Bowles v. SeminoleSearch
-
advanced by an agency seeking to defend past agency action against attack, Bowen v. GeorgetownSearch
-
Arnold v. BenSearch
-
Syllabus Aver Et Al. V. RobbinsSearch
-
See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
of Garcia v. SanSearch
-
Sandra J. Boyd and Daniel v. YagerSearch
-
Arthur A. Hartinger, Louise H. Renne, and Jonathan v. HoltzmanSearch
-
Hess v. PortSearch
-
the Tenth Amendment, Garcia v. SanSearch
-
Mueller v. ReichSearch
-
the Eighth Circuit, McDonnell v. OmahaSearch
-
Yourman v. DinkinsSearch
-
Michigan Assn. of Governmental Employees v. MichiganSearch
-
Bowles v. SeminoleSearch
-
Bowen v. GeorgetownSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial