Citation network
Chandler Vs. Miller
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 15, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 305 (1997) October Term, 1996 Syllabus Chandler Et Al. V. MillerSearch
-
on this Court's precedents sustaining drug-testing programs for student athletes, Vernonia School Dist. 4- 7 J v. ActonSearch
-
U. S. 646 , 650, 665-666, Customs Service employees, Treasury Employees v. VonSearch
-
Raab, 489 U. S. 656 , 659, and railway employees, Skinner v. RailwaySearch
-
See Treasury Employees v. VonSearch
-
circumstances include brief stops for questioning or observation at a fixed Border Patrol checkpoint, United States v. Martinez-FuerteSearch
-
U. S. 543 , 545-550, 566-567 (1976), or at a sobriety checkpoint, Michigan Dept. of State Police v. SitzSearch
-
businesses, New York v. BurgerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
programs for student athletes, customs employees, and railway employees, see Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. ActonSearch
-
Skinner v. RailwaySearch
-
Id., at 657 (quoting New Jersey v. becauseSearch
-
it under the Tenth Amendment, to establish qualifications for those who seek state office. Respondents rely on Gregory v. AshcroftSearch
-
Communist Party of Ind. v. WhitcombSearch
-
In Treasury Employees v. VonSearch
-
National Treasury Employees Union v. VonSearch
-
to demonstrate the agency's commitment to enforcement of the law. See Brief for United States in Treasury Employees v. VonSearch
-
Olmstead v. UnitedSearch
-
on financial disclosure requirements, which implicate different concerns and procedures. See, e. g., Barry v. CitySearch
-
Plante v. GonzalezSearch
-
not speak to drug testing in the private sector, a domain unguarded by Fourth Amendment constraints. See United States v. JacobsenSearch
-
Ante, at 309. But if we are to heed the oft-quoted words of Justice Brandeis in his dissent in New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSearch
-
of our society. Cases before this Court involving drug use extend to numerous occupations-railway employees, Skinner v. RailwaySearch
-
Labor Executives' Assn., 489 U. S. 602 (1989), Border Patrol officers, Treasury Employees v. VonSearch
-
Raab, 489 U. S. 656 (1989), high school students, Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. ActonSearch
-
U. S. 646 (1995), and machine operators, Paperworkers v. MiscoSearch
-
information.' Department of Navy v. EganSearch
-
Syllabus Chandler Et Al. V. MillerSearch
-
Treasury Employees v. VonSearch
-
Michigan Dept. of State Police v. SitzSearch
-
New Jersey v. becauseSearch
-
Barry v. CitySearch
-
See United States v. JacobsenSearch
-
Paperworkers v. MiscoSearch
-
Department of Navy v. EganSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial