Citation network
Richards Vs. Wisconsin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 28, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 385 (1997) October Term, 1996 Syllabus Richards V. WisconsinSearch
-
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN No. 96-5955. Argued March 24, 1997-Decided April 28, 1997 In Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
in the execution of search warrants and the individual privacy interests affected by no-knock entries. Cf. Maryland v. BuieSearch
-
JUSTICE STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court. In Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
court proceeded to consider whether our decision in Wilson required the court to abandon its decision in State v. StevensSearch
-
to search a home for narcotics always allows the police to forgo the knockand-announce requirement. See, e. g., People v. LujanSearch
-
Henson v. StateSearch
-
State v. LoucksSearch
-
U. S. 963 (1966). 2 This Court has encountered before the links between drugs and violence, see, e. g., Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
and the likelihood that drug dealers will attempt to dispose of drugs before police seize them, see, e. g., Ker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Inc., et al. as Amici Curiae 10-11, Brief for Wayne County, Michigan, as Amicus Curiae 39 46, in Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
reply brief, did address the arguments put forward by the amicus briefs, Reply Brief for Petitioner in Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
arguments against a categorical rule. Brief for American Civil Liberties Union et al. as Amici Curiae in Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
if a later, less virtuous age should become accustomed to considering all sorts of intrusion 'reasonable.''' Minnesota v. DickersonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
interests implicated by an unannounced, forcible entry should not be unduly minimized. As we observed in Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
But see State V. ArceSearch
-
State v. BamberSearch
-
Syllabus Richards V. WisconsinSearch
-
In Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
Cf. Maryland v. BuieSearch
-
of the Court. In Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
State v. StevensSearch
-
People v. LujanSearch
-
Michigan v. SummersSearch
-
Ker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
Minnesota v. DickersonSearch
-
State v. ArceSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial