Citation network
Edwards Vs. Balisok
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 19, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 641 (1997) October Term, 1996 Syllabus Edwards Et Al. V. BalisokSearch
-
of the lost good-time credits in an appropriate forum, he refrained from requesting that relief in light of Preiser v. RodriguezSearch
-
sole remedy in federal court for a prisoner seeking such restoration is habeas corpus. The District Court applied Heck v. HumphreySearch
-
proceeding would necessarily imply the invalidity of the deprivation of his good-time credits. Cf., e. g., Tumey v. OhioSearch
-
W Corbett, Jr., of Pennsylvania, 643 JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In Heck v. HumphreySearch
-
future violations, and any other relief the court deems just and equitable. Taking account of our opinion in Preiser v. RodriguezSearch
-
if he proves the former one without also proving the latter one. See Carey v. PiphusSearch
-
See App. to Pet. for Cert. A-2, citing Gotcher v. WoodSearch
-
federal courts have reinstated good-time credits (absent a new hearing) when it is established. See, e. g., Kingsley v. BureauSearch
-
Dumas v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mahers v. StateSearch
-
by a partial judge is entitled to have his conviction set aside, no matter how strong the evidence against him. Tumey v. OhioSearch
-
Brief for Respondent 7, citing Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSearch
-
To prevail, of course, respondent must establish standing, see Lewis v. CaseySearch
-
U. S. 343 , 351-354 (1996), and meet the usual requirements for injunctive relief, see, e. g., O'Shea v. LittletonSearch
-
see Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
Syllabus Edwards Et Al. V. BalisokSearch
-
of Preiser v. RodriguezSearch
-
Tumey v. OhioSearch
-
of the Court. In Heck v. HumphreySearch
-
See Carey v. PiphusSearch
-
Gotcher v. WoodSearch
-
Kingsley v. BureauSearch
-
Walpole v. HillSearch
-
Lewis v. CaseySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial