Citation network
Gilbert Vs. Homar
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 09, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 924 (1997) October Term, 1996 Syllabus Gilbert, President, East Stroudsburg University, Et Al. V. HamarSearch
-
and a hearing before suspending a tenured public employee without pay. Pp. 928-936. (a) In Cleveland Bd. of Ed. v. LoudermillSearch
-
Due process is flexible and calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands. Morrissey v. BrewerSearch
-
and (3) the Government's interest. Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
but account must be taken of the length and finality of the temporary deprivation of his pay. Logan v. ZimmermanSearch
-
in 929 their tenure and cannot be fired without due process, see Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
once to petitioners' contention that respondent received all the process he was due. A In Cleveland Bd. of Ed. v. LoudermillSearch
-
Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers v. McElroySearch
-
process, postdeprivation process satisfies the requirements of the Due Process Clause. See, e. g., United States v. JamesSearch
-
U. S. 306 , 314-320 (1908). Indeed, in Parratt v. TaylorSearch
-
U. S. 527 (1981), overruled in part on other grounds, Daniels v. WilliamsSearch
-
U. S., at 540. And in FDIC v. MallenSearch
-
Brief for Appellee in FDIC v. MallenSearch
-
Logan v. ZimmermanSearch
-
is at least as significant as the State's interest in preserving the integrity of the sport of horse racing, see Barry v. BarchiSearch
-
the independently verifiable fact of whether an employee had indeed been formally charged with a felony. See Codd v. VelgerSearch
-
and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. 937 VEY v. CLINTONSearch
-
Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. For the reasons stated in Martin v. DistrictSearch
-
Rule 33.1. We enter the order barring future in forma pauperis filings for the reasons discussed in Martin v. DistrictSearch
-
no part in the decision of this case. JUSTICE STEVENS, dissenting. For reasons previously stated, see Martin v. DistrictSearch
-
Syllabus Gilbert, President, East Stroudsburg University, Et Al. V. HamarSearch
-
In Cleveland Bd. of Ed. v. LoudermillSearch
-
A In Cleveland Bd. of Ed. v. LoudermillSearch
-
United States v. JamesSearch
-
Parratt v. TaylorSearch
-
Daniels v. WilliamsSearch
-
See Codd v. VelgerSearch
-
Vey V. ClintonSearch
-
Martin v. DistrictSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial