Citation network
Mazurek Vs. Armstrong
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 16, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 968 (1997) October Term, 1996 Syllabus Mazurek, Attorney General of Montana V. ArmstrongSearch
-
of prevailing on their claim that the law imposed an undue burden under Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySearch
-
Court's repeated statements that the performance of abortions may be restricted to physicians. See, e. g., Roe v. WadeSearch
-
as interpreted in Spears V. StateSearch
-
within the meaning of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySearch
-
and not the actual performance of abortions, yet we nonetheless held-overruling our prior holding in Akron v. AkronSearch
-
do not assume unconstitutional legislative intent even when statutes produce harmful results, see, e. g., Washington v. DavisSearch
-
may be restricted to physicians. We first expressed this view (although it was not necessary to our holding) in Roe v. WadeSearch
-
We reiterated this view in Connecticut v. MenilloSearch
-
ordinarily reluctant to exercise our certiorari jurisdiction in that circumstance. See, e. g., HamiltonBrown Shoe Co. v. WolfSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
clear that there is no absolute bar to review of nonfinal judgments of the lower federal courts, see, e. g., Estelle v. GambleSearch
-
United States v. GeneralSearch
-
to a state approved plan,l it did not disqualify Cahill from continuing her work with Dr. Armstrong. ISee Doe v. EschSearch
-
U. S. 833 , 901 (1992), the Court of Appeals looked to our recent decisions in Miller v. JohnsonSearch
-
U. S. 900 (1995), and Shaw v. HuntSearch
-
there is substantial evidence indicating that the sole purpose of the stat- 4 In Doe v. EschSearch
-
supra, the court enjoined enforcement of the hospitalization requirement, and in Doe v. DeschampsSearch
-
provide some enlightenment as to whether the Court of Appeals misread this Court's opinions in Miller and Shaw v. HuntSearch
-
States Reports. 983 MARCH 3,1997 Certiorari Granted-Vacated and Remanded No. 95-1028. UNITED STATES V. FADEMSearch
-
Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. BrockampSearch
-
him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. No. M-61. JOSEPH ET AL. V. QUAGLINOSearch
-
CO. ET AL. Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied. No. M-62. DUNBAR V. IOWASearch
-
the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time under this Court's Rule 14.5 denied. No. 96-79. BOGGS v. BOGGSSearch
-
to file a supplemental brief as amicus curiae after argument granted. No. 96-272. METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. V. RAMBOSearch
-
Syllabus Mazurek, Attorney General of Montana V. ArmstrongSearch
-
Spears v. StateSearch
-
of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySearch
-
Akron v. AkronSearch
-
Washington v. DavisSearch
-
HamiltonBrown Shoe Co. v. WolfSearch
-
Dr. Armstrong. ISee Doe v. EschSearch
-
Miller v. JohnsonSearch
-
and Shaw v. HuntSearch
-
In Doe v. EschSearch
-
Doe v. DeschampsSearch
-
Miller and Shaw v. HuntSearch
-
United States V. FademSearch
-
of United States v. BrockampSearch
-
Court. No. M-61. Joseph Et Al. V. QuaglinoSearch
-
No. M-62. Dunbar V. IowaSearch
-
Metropolitan Stevedore Co. V. RamboSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial