Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bates Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Oct 07, 1997

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 3 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Woods US Supreme Court · Dec 03, 2013
  2. United States Vs. Ness US Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1917
  3. United States Vs. Wong US Supreme Court · May 23, 1977
  4. Bates v. United
    Search
  5. States - 522 U.S. 23 (1997) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Bates V. United
    Search
  6. and purposely where it includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another. See Russello v. United
    Search
  7. a) does not reach the failure to make refunds. Cf. Commissioner v. Estate
    Search
  8. into the misapplication proscription, the rule of lenity does not come into play in this case. See United States v. Wells
    Search
  9. Id., at 970. The Seventh Circuit's decision conflicts with the Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States v. Kammer
    Search
  10. Russello v. United
    Search
  11. States, 464 U. S. 16 , 23 (1983) (quoting United States v. Wong
    Search
  12. upon the District Court's reasoning in this case. The District Court, like the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. Kammer
    Search
  13. intent. 4 United States v. Whitlock
    Search
  14. United States v. Wester
    Search
  15. United States v. Castiglia
    Search
  16. United States v. Thomas
    Search
  17. United States v. Duncan
    Search
  18. United States v. McCord
    Search
  19. F.3d 1434 , 1448 (CA5 1994), cert. denied sub nom. Haley v. United
    Search
  20. United States v. Crabtree
    Search
  21. United States v. Wolfswinkel
    Search
  22. United States v. Evans
    Search
  23. United States v. Morales
    Search
  24. United States v. Bates
    Search
  25. see Brief for Petitioner 5, does not fit within that construction.7 6 Ratzlaf v. United
    Search
  26. a) did not previously cover the conduct in question. Cf. Commissioner v. Estate
    Search
  27. into the misapplication proscription. The rule of lenity, therefore, does not come into play. See United States v. Wells
    Search
  28. Syllabus Bates V. United
    Search
  29. See Russello v. United
    Search
  30. Cf. Commissioner v. Estate
    Search
  31. See United States v. Wells
    Search
  32. United States v. Kammer
    Search
  33. United States v. Whitlock
    Search
  34. Haley v. United
    Search
  35. Ratzlaf v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial