Citation network
Bates Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 07, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Bates v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 522 U.S. 23 (1997) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Bates V. UnitedSearch
-
and purposely where it includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another. See Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
a) does not reach the failure to make refunds. Cf. Commissioner v. EstateSearch
-
into the misapplication proscription, the rule of lenity does not come into play in this case. See United States v. WellsSearch
-
Id., at 970. The Seventh Circuit's decision conflicts with the Eleventh Circuit's decision in United States v. KammerSearch
-
Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 464 U. S. 16 , 23 (1983) (quoting United States v. WongSearch
-
upon the District Court's reasoning in this case. The District Court, like the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. KammerSearch
-
intent. 4 United States v. WhitlockSearch
-
United States v. WesterSearch
-
United States v. CastigliaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. ThomasSearch
-
United States v. DuncanSearch
-
United States v. McCordSearch
-
F.3d 1434 , 1448 (CA5 1994), cert. denied sub nom. Haley v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CrabtreeSearch
-
United States v. WolfswinkelSearch
-
United States v. EvansSearch
-
United States v. MoralesSearch
-
United States v. BatesSearch
-
see Brief for Petitioner 5, does not fit within that construction.7 6 Ratzlaf v. UnitedSearch
-
a) did not previously cover the conduct in question. Cf. Commissioner v. EstateSearch
-
into the misapplication proscription. The rule of lenity, therefore, does not come into play. See United States v. WellsSearch
-
Syllabus Bates V. UnitedSearch
-
See Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Commissioner v. EstateSearch
-
See United States v. WellsSearch
-
United States v. KammerSearch
-
United States v. WhitlockSearch
-
Haley v. UnitedSearch
-
Ratzlaf v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial