Citation network
Salinas Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 08, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Salinas v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 522 U.S. 52 (1997) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Salinas V. UnitedSearch
-
statute's plain and unambiguous meaning, petitioner is not aided by the legislative history, see, e. g., United States v. AlbertiniSearch
-
U. S. 675 , 680, or by the plain-statement rule set forth in Gregory v. AshcroftSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 452 , 460-461, and McNally v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 483 U. S. 350 , 360, see, e. g., Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. FloridaSearch
-
a threat to the integrity and proper operation of the federal program under which the jail was managed. See Westfall v. UnitedSearch
-
phrase to have its ordinary meaning under the criminal law, see Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
c) violates the foregoing principles and is refuted by Bannon v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 156 U. S. 464 , 469. Its acceptance, moreover, is not required by the rule of lenity, see United States v. ShabaniSearch
-
count and the bribery counts. A divided panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed, United States v. MarmolejoSearch
-
the business or transaction clause, undercuts the attempt to impose this narrowing construction. See United States v. JamesSearch
-
Trainmen v. BaltimoreSearch
-
U. S. 675 , 680 (1985) (citations 58 omitted) (quoting Garcia v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Ardestani v. INSSearch
-
a). Compare United States v. DelSearch
-
Toro, 513 F.2d 656 , 661-662 (CA2), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 826 (1975), with United States v. MosleySearch
-
F.2d 812 , 814-816 (CA7 1981), and United States v. HintonSearch
-
F. 2d 195, 197-200 (CA7 1982), aff'd sub nom. Dixson v. UnitedSearch
-
to satisfy whatever connection the statute might require. Salinas argues in addition that our decisions in Gregory v. AshcroftSearch
-
U. S. 452 (1991), and McNally v. UnitedSearch
-
canon is not a license 60 for the judiciary to rewrite language enacted by the legislature. Heckler v. MathewsSearch
-
of the Constitution. United States v. LockeSearch
-
proper respect to the federalstate balance. As we observed in applying an analogous maxim in Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. FloridaSearch
-
that the statute encompasses the conduct at issue. Ibid. Compare United States v. BassSearch
-
to construe an ambiguous firearm-possession statute to apply only to firearms affecting commerce), with United States v. LopezSearch
-
a)(1)(B) to Salinas did not extend federal power beyond its proper bounds. See Westfall v. UnitedSearch
-
visits, because that question is not fairly included within the questions on which we granted certiorari. See Yee v. EscondidoSearch
-
provision, the defendant must himself commit or agree to commit two or more predicate acts. See United States v. SandersSearch
-
United States v. RuggieroSearch
-
F. 2d 913, 921 (CA2), cert. denied sub nom. Rabito v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. WinterSearch
-
Eight other Courts of Appeals, including the Fifth Circuit in this case, take a contrary view. See United States v. PrybaSearch
-
United States v. KragnessSearch
-
United States v. NeapolitanSearch
-
United States v. JosephSearch
-
United States v. AdamsSearch
-
United States v. TilleSearch
-
F.2d 1514 , 1529-1531 (CAll), cert. denied sub nom. Morris v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial