Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Trest Vs. Cain

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 10, 1997

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 1 linked 25 unlinked
Show
  1. Gray Vs. Netherland US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1996
  2. U.S. 87 (1997) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Trest V. Cain
    Search
  3. Trest v. Whitley
    Search
  4. General of Montana, and Frankie Sue Del Papa, Attorney General of Nevada. 89 generally Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  5. default, that is, a critical failure to comply with state procedural law, is not a jurisdictional matter. See Lambrix v. Singletary
    Search
  6. see Jenkins v. Anderson
    Search
  7. though it did not require) the Fifth Circuit to raise the procedural default sua sponte. Cf. Granberry v. Greer
    Search
  8. may consider a procedural default that the State at some point has waived, or failed to raise. Compare Esslinger v. Davis
    Search
  9. CAll 1995) (sua sponte invocation of procedural default serves no important federal interest), with Hardiman v. Reynolds
    Search
  10. his court's decision in Sones v. Hargett
    Search
  11. or not Trest has fully, or partially, exhausted his current federal claims by raising them in state court. Cf. Rose v. Lundy
    Search
  12. defense. Cf. Granberry v. Greer
    Search
  13. despite the failure of any state court to assert one. See Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  14. him about his rights to appeal, to trial by jury, to confront witnesses, and not to incriminate himself. Cf. Boykin v. Alabama
    Search
  15. State v. Robicheaux
    Search
  16. Syllabus TREST v. CAIN
    Search
  17. Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  18. See Lambrix v. Singletary
    Search
  19. Jenkins v. Anderson
    Search
  20. Cf. Granberry v. Greer
    Search
  21. Compare Esslinger v. Davis
    Search
  22. Hardiman v. Reynolds
    Search
  23. Sones v. Hargett
    Search
  24. Cf. Rose v. Lundy
    Search
  25. See Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  26. Cf. Boykin v. Alabama
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales