Citation network
Spencer Vs. Kemna
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 12, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States at October Term, 1997 Syllabus Spencer V. KemnaSearch
-
or, what is effectively the same, has counted collateral consequences that are remote and unlikely to occur). Sibron v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
York, 392 U. S. 40 , 55-56. However, in Lane v. WilliamsSearch
-
unless he can establish his parole revocation's invalidity, see Heck v. HumphreySearch
-
of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the District Court's judgment,2 concluding that, under our decision in Lane v. WilliamsSearch
-
that this interpretation of Lane did not accord with that of the Second and Ninth Circuits in United States v. ParkerSearch
-
scheduled to be released on parole on January 24, 1999. See Brief for Respondents 8, n. 4. 7 and Robbins v. ChristiansonSearch
-
Lewis v. ContinentalSearch
-
Bank Corp., 494 U. S. 472 , 477-478 (1990). See also Preiser v. NewkirkSearch
-
or, what is effectively the same, to count collateral consequences that are remote and unlikely to occur). See Sibron v. NewSearch
-
of the right to vote, to hold office, to serve on a jury, or to engage in certain businesses). Thus, in St. Pierre v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S., at 237 (footnotes and citation omitted). See also Fiswick v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MorganSearch
-
Ginsberg v. NewSearch
-
conviction rendered petitioner liable to revocation of his license to operate luncheonette business). Cf. Tannenbaum v. NewSearch
-
Jacobs v. NewSearch
-
per curiam). The gateway to abandonment of this fastidious approach to collateral consequences was Pollard v. UnitedSearch
-
case involving consequences for an alien (which there is no reason to 10 believe Pollard was), see Pino v. LandonSearch
-
U. S. 901 (1955). In Sibron v. NewSearch
-
and hypothetical of consequences as sufficient to avoid mootness in challenges to conviction. For example, in Evitts v. LuceySearch
-
Ibid. See also Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
from averments in the pleadings,' but rather 3 Sibron also purported to rely on United States v. MorganSearch
-
U. S. 502 (1954), and Fiswick v. UnitedSearch
-
PBS, Inc. v. DallasSearch
-
U. S. 186 , 204 (1962). Sibron appears in the same volume of the United States Reports as Flast v. CohenSearch
-
Id., at 100-10l. See Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
-
id., at 476. See also Lujan v. DefendersSearch
-
consequences (or our willingness to accept hypothetical consequences) to the area of parole revocation. In Lane v. WilliamsSearch
-
as a result of the petitioner's conviction, he was presently 4 The internal quotation is from a portion of Flast v. CohenSearch
-
Shaw v. MissouriSearch
-
U. S. 488 , 497 (1974). See also Los Angeles v. LyonsSearch
-
used against him directly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 4056 (or Missouri's state-law equivalent, see Durbin v. CassaloSearch
-
more reliable evidence of two past criminal convictions that would achieve the same purpose of impeachment, see State v. ComstockSearch
-
it is not even clear that a Missouri court could legally admit the parole revocation to impeach petitioner. See State v. NewmanSearch
-
unnecessary the inquiry into concrete collateral consequences of conviction in many of our cases, see, e. g., Benton v. MarylandSearch
-
raises three more arguments, none of which seems to us well taken. First, he contends that since our decision in Heck v. HumphreySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial