Citation network
Bogan Vs. Scott-harris
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 03, 1997
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 44 (1997) October Term, 1997 Syllabus Bogan Et Al. V. Scott-HarrisSearch
-
their legislative activities as has long been accorded to federal, state, and regional legislators. See, e. g., Tenney v. BrandhoveSearch
-
Amy v. SupervisorsSearch
-
government, where prestige and pecuniary rewards may pale in comparison to the threat of civilliability. See Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
including the availability of municipal liability for constitutional violations, e. g., Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. TahoeSearch
-
branch are entitled to legislative immunity when they perform legislative functions, see Supreme Court of Va. v. ConsumersSearch
-
Bogan's actions were legislative because they were integral steps in the legislative process. Cf., e. g., Edwards v. UnitedSearch
-
and Roderick's motions to dismiss on the ground of legislative immunity, and the case proceeded to trial. Scott-Harris v. CitySearch
-
Circuit set aside the verdict against the city but affirmed the judgments against Roderick and Bogan. Scott-Harris v. FallSearch
-
Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. TahoeSearch
-
see also Kilbourn v. ThompsonSearch
-
States to coordinate and regulate development in a region encompassing portions of both States. Lake Country Estates v. TahoeSearch
-
Regional Planning Agency, 440 U. S., at 394. 50 their discretionary decisions. Wilson v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
could not be held liable under state law for their role in the adoption of an allegedly unlawful ordinance. Jones v. LovingSearch
-
emphasized that the defendant officials lacked discretion, and the duties were thus ministerial. See, e. g., Morris v. TheSearch
-
Caswell v. AllenSearch
-
Respondent's heavy reliance on our decision in Amy v. SupervisorsSearch
-
finds support not only in history, but also in reason. See Tenney v. BrandhoveSearch
-
should not be inhibited by judicial interference or distorted by the fear of personal liability. See Spallone v. UnitedSearch
-
government, where prestige and pecuniary rewards may pale in comparison to the threat of civil liability. See Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
Government are often protected by sovereign immunity. Lake Country Estates, supra, at 405, n. 29 (citing Monell v. NewSearch
-
rationale of Lake Country Estates essentially settled the question of immunity for local legislators. See Owen v. IndependenceSearch
-
see also Spallone v. UnitedSearch
-
branch are entitled to legislative immunity when they perform legislative functions, see Su preme Court of Va. v. ConsumersSearch
-
Bogan's actions were legislative because they were integral steps in the legislative process. Cf. Edwards v. UnitedSearch
-
Syllabus Bogan Et Al. V. Scott-HarrisSearch
-
See Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
Supreme Court of Va. v. ConsumersSearch
-
Edwards v. UnitedSearch
-
Scott-Harris v. CitySearch
-
Roderick and Bogan. Scott-Harris v. FallSearch
-
Kilbourn v. ThompsonSearch
-
States. Lake Country Estates v. TahoeSearch
-
Wilson v. NewSearch
-
Jones v. LovingSearch
-
Morris v. TheSearch
-
See Tenney v. BrandhoveSearch
-
See Spallone v. UnitedSearch
-
Monell v. NewSearch
-
See Owen v. IndependenceSearch
-
Spallone v. UnitedSearch
-
Court of Va. v. ConsumersSearch
-
Cf. Edwards v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial