Citation network
Peacock Vs. Thomas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 21, 1996
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 349 (1996) October Term, 1995 Syllabus Peacock V. ThomasSearch
-
other supplementary proceedings involving third parties are inapposite. This case is governed by H. C. Cook Co. v. BeecherSearch
-
against Tru-Tech only. Thomas v. Tru-TechSearch
-
District Court rejected the claim against him. 2 Compare 39 F.3d 493 (CA4 1994) (case below), Argento v. MelroseSearch
-
Park, 838 F.2d 1483 (CA7 1988), Skevofilax v. QuigleySearch
-
F.2d 378 (CA3) (en bane), cert. denied, 481 U. S. 1029 (1987), and Blackburn Truck Lines, Inc. v. FrancisSearch
-
F.2d 730 (CA9 1984), with Sandlin v. CorporateSearch
-
Interiors Inc., 972 F.2d 1212 (CAW 1992), and Berry v. McLemoreSearch
-
provision of ERISA that provides for imposing liability for an extant ERISA judgment against a third party. See Mackey v. LanierSearch
-
Mertens v. HewittSearch
-
Kokkonen v. GuardianSearch
-
his burden of demonstrating that this suit falls within either cate- 4 This case is not at all like Anderson v. AbbottSearch
-
Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
have jurisdiction over a case or controversy before it may assert jurisdiction over ancillary claims. See Mine Workers v. GibbsSearch
-
Riggs v. JohnsonSearch
-
attachment, mandamus, garnishment, and the prejudgment avoidance of fraudulent conveyances. See, e. g., Mackey v. LanierSearch
-
Swift & Co. Packers v. CompaniaSearch
-
Dewey v. WestSearch
-
Labette County Comm'rs v. UnitedSearch
-
on a person not already liable for that judgment. Indeed, we rejected an attempt to do so in H. C. Cook Co. v. BeecherSearch
-
for Thomas, suggests that the proceeding below was jurisdictionally indistinguishable from Swift & Co. Packers v. CompaniaSearch
-
Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A., 339 U. S. 684 (1950), Dewey v. WestSearch
-
Fairmont Gas Coal Co., 123 U. S. 329 (1887), Labette County Comm'rs v. UnitedSearch
-
States ex rel. Moulton, 112 U. S. 217 (1884), and Riggs v. JohnsonSearch
-
than that of the prior decree. Dugas v. AmericanSearch
-
Way man v. SouthardSearch
-
exercised that control to defeat satisfaction of the judgment. In substance the Court so held in Riggs v. JohnsonSearch
-
County, 6 Wall. 166 (1868), and in Labette County Comm'rs v. UnitedSearch
-
with Riggs and Labette. I am also persuaded that the Court's reliance on H. C. Cook Co. v. BeecherSearch
-
Syllabus Peacock V. ThomasSearch
-
Thomas v. Tru-TechSearch
-
Argento v. MelroseSearch
-
Skevofilax v. QuigleySearch
-
and Blackburn Truck Lines, Inc. v. FrancisSearch
-
Sandlin v. CorporateSearch
-
and Berry v. McLemoreSearch
-
See Mackey v. LanierSearch
-
Anderson v. AbbottSearch
-
See Mine Workers v. GibbsSearch
-
Mackey v. LanierSearch
-
and Riggs v. JohnsonSearch
-
Dugas v. AmericanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial