Citation network
Lane Vs. Peandntilde;a
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 15, 1996
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 187 (1996) October Term, 1995 Syllabus Lane V. PenaSearch
-
of congressional intent to grant such a waiver, see, e. g., Irwin v. DepartmentSearch
-
for violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964-including monetary damages awards, see, e. g., Franklin v. GwinnettSearch
-
DC 1994). Shortly thereafter, however, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Dorsey v. UnitedSearch
-
damages, and this Court's instruction that waivers of sovereign immunity may not be implied, see, e. g., Irwin v. DepartmentSearch
-
a) of the Rehabilitation Act. Compare, e. g., Dorsey, supra, at 1554-1555, with J. L. v. SocialSearch
-
Security Admin., 971 F.2d 260 (CA9 1992), and Doe v. AttorneySearch
-
a)(2). Because Title VI provides for monetary damages awards, see Franklin v. GwinnettSearch
-
of the Court confirmed in Guardians Assn. v. CivilSearch
-
Government's sovereign immunity must be unequivocally expressed in statutory text, see, e. g., United States v. NordicSearch
-
Village, Inc., 503 U. S. 30 , 33-34, 37 (1992), and will not be implied, Irwin v. DepartmentSearch
-
will be strictly construed, in terms of its scope, in favor of the sovereign. See, e. g., United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Department of Transp. v. ParalyzedSearch
-
places the Federal Government on an entirely different footing than private parties. Petitioner's reliance on Franklin v. GwinnettSearch
-
a) violations. Section 1003 was enacted in response to our decision in Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSearch
-
with respect to a statutory provision must be interpreted in the light of the contemporary legal context. Franklin v. GwinnettSearch
-
created a private cause of action. See Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
a). 3 See, e. g., Kampmeier v. NyquistSearch
-
NAACP v. MedicalSearch
-
Pandazides v. VirginiaSearch
-
Camenisch v. UniversitySearch
-
on other 203 In my opinion the Courts of Appeals are undoubtedly correct.4 Our decision in Franklin v. GwinnettSearch
-
whatever the traditional presumption may have been when the Court decided Bell v. HoodSearch
-
Jennings v. AlexanderSearch
-
F.2d 1036 , 1040 1041 (CA6 1983), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Alexander v. ChoateSearch
-
Lloyd v. RegionalSearch
-
Miener v. MissouriSearch
-
Kling v. CountySearch
-
Pushkin v. RegentsSearch
-
Jones v. MetropolitanSearch
-
apparently must be read in a vacuum. Since the advent of United States v. NordicSearch
-
The Court distinguishes Franklin v. GwinnettSearch
-
on cases in which pecuniary awards against the United States had been upheld. See 503 U. S., at 67 (citing Kendall v. UnitedSearch
-
States ex rel. Stokes, 12 Pet. 524 (1838), and Dooley v. UnitedSearch
-
owed to the States-a respect that provided the ratio decidendi for our decision in Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSearch
-
has enacted numerous pieces of legislation designed to override statutory opinions of this Court. See Landgraf v. USISearch
-
Syllabus LANE v. PENASearch
-
Irwin v. DepartmentSearch
-
Franklin v. GwinnettSearch
-
Dorsey v. UnitedSearch
-
J. L. v. SocialSearch
-
and Doe v. AttorneySearch
-
Guardians Assn. v. CivilSearch
-
United States v. NordicSearch
-
United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSearch
-
See Cannon v. UniversitySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial