Citation network
Henderson Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 20, 1996
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Henderson v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 517 U.S. 654 (1996) October Term, 1995 Syllabus Henderson V. UnitedSearch
-
a suit on a right created by federal law, filing a complaint suffices to satisfy the statute of limitations. See West v. ConrailSearch
-
before the statute of limitations has run, if state law so requires for a similar state-court suit. See Walker v. ArmcoSearch
-
Steel Corp., 446 U. S. 740 , 752-753 (1980) (reaffirming Ragan v. MerchantsSearch
-
Transfer & Warehouse Co., 337 U. S. 530 (1949)). But cf. Hanna v. PlumerSearch
-
the Government's motion, but reconsidered the matter based on an intervening Fifth Circuit decision, United States v. HolmbergSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Id., at 576. 8 Compare, e. g., Libby v. UnitedSearch
-
Kenyon v. UnitedSearch
-
irreducible allowance. Prior to 1983, Rule 4 contained no time limit for service. Until the changes installed that year, v. UnitedSearch
-
F.2d 683 , 685-686 (CA2), cert. dism'd, 371 U. S. 907 (1962), with Jones & Laughlin Steel, Inc. v. MonSearch
-
immunity waiver by providing for costs and interest on money judgments against the United States.ll See United States v. BodcawSearch
-
Libby v. UnitedSearch
-
of various procedural lapses in the same manner as 'if such vessel were privately owned or operated.''' Battaglia v. UnitedSearch
-
b). See Jones & Laughlin Steel, Inc. v. MonSearch
-
provision of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c). See Ashland v. Ling-Temco-Search
-
See United States v. SherwoodSearch
-
claims against United States, does not authorize joinder of claims between private parties). 22 See United States v. NordicSearch
-
the Government's sovereign immunity from bankruptcy trustee's monetary relief claims). 23 See Library of Congress v. ShawSearch
-
of immunity from suit for damages does not waive immunity with respect to interest). 24 See, e. g., United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
Block v. NorthSearch
-
to the waiver, with the result that failure to comply will deprive a court of u. S. 273, 287 (1983). But cf. Honda v. ClarkSearch
-
to preserve petitioners' cause of action where similar suit was filed within 60-day limitation). 25 See Mullane v. CentralSearch
-
Dakota ex rel. Board of Univ. and School Lands, 461 U. S. 273 , 287 (1983). See also Lehman v. NakshianSearch
-
of a waiver of sovereign immunity, ambiguity must always be resolved in favor of the Government. See United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
United States v. NordicSearch
-
Inc., 503 U. S. 30 , 34 (1992) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). See also Library of Congress v. ShawSearch
-
cannot be superseded by a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. Sovereign immunity is by nature jurisdictional, FDIC v. MeyerSearch
-
Sherwood, supra, at 589.1 1 For instance, in United States v. SherwoodSearch
-
Soriano v. UnitedSearch
-
Id., at 591. 2 See United States v. HolmbergSearch
-
Amella v. UnitedSearch
-
Battaglia v. UnitedSearch
-
cert. dism'd, 371 U. S. 907 (1962). Only one Circuit has gone the other way. See Jones & Laughlin Steel, Inc. v. MonSearch
-
naturally. But that is not the case. As the Government concedes, the Rules Enabling 3 Although we held in Irwin v. DepartmentSearch
-
stricter, treatment of statutes of limitations in the sovereign immunity context, but our decision in United States v. WilliamsSearch
-
U. S., at 534, n. 7, and cited for this proposition United States v. DalmSearch
-
F.2d 711 , 713 (CA9 1984) (citing Black's Law Dictionary 588 (5th ed. 1979)). See also Dick erman v. NorthernSearch
-
Syllabus Henderson V. UnitedSearch
-
See West v. ConrailSearch
-
See Walker v. ArmcoSearch
-
Ragan v. MerchantsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial