Citation network
Lewis Vs. Casey
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 24, 1996
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 343 (1996) October Term, 1995 Syllabus Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Et Al. V. CaseySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
legal research facilities and thereby depriving them of their right of access to the courts, in violation of Bounds v. SmithSearch
-
for even named plaintiffs in a class action must show that they personally have been injured, see, e. g., Simon v. EasternSearch
-
Court failed to accord the judgment of prison authorities the substantial deference required by cases such as Turner v. SafleySearch
-
The court also failed to leave with prison officials the primary responsibility for devising a remedy. Compare Preiser v. RodriguezSearch
-
for the Mexican American Legal 346 JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In Bounds v. SmithSearch
-
principle that prevents courts of law from undertaking tasks assigned to the political branches. See Allen v. WrightSearch
-
Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
-
we shall discuss, the point relates to standing, which is jurisdictional and not subject to waiver. See United States v. HaysSearch
-
PBS, Inc. v. DallasSearch
-
of needed medical treatment were able to claim violation of his constitutional right to medical care, see Estelle v. GambleSearch
-
state prison officials from actively interfering with inmates' attempts to prepare legal documents, e. g., Johnson v. AverySearch
-
Ex parte Hull, 312 U. S. 546 , 547-549 (1941), and by requiring state courts to waive filing fees, e. g., Burns v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 252 , 258 (1959), or transcript fees, e. g., Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
that contained the original complaints in two of the more significant inmate-initiated cases in recent years, Sandin v. ConnerSearch
-
U. S. 472 (1995), and Hudson v. McMillianSearch
-
of unaddressed jurisdictional defects has no precedential effect. See, e. g., Federal Election Comm'n v. NRASearch
-
United States v. MoreSearch
-
that a nonfrivolous 3 legal claim had been frustrated or was being impeded.4 3 JUSTICE SOUTER believes that Bounds v. SmithSearch
-
post, at 398399, quoting Flast v. CohenSearch
-
was the only value protected by standing. See, e. g., United States v. RichardsonSearch
-
Schlesinger v. ReservistsSearch
-
no relevant injury in fact, i. e., injury-in-fact caused by the violation of legal right. See Allen v. WrightSearch
-
attempts by inmates to pursue direct appeals from the convictions for which they were incarcerated, see Douglas v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 255 , 256 (1942), or habeas petitions, see Johnson v. AverySearch
-
Ex parte Hull, supra, at 547548. In Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
Supplemental App. to Pet. for Cert. in Bounds v. SmithSearch
-
course be limited to the inadequacy that produced the injury in fact that the plaintiff has established. See Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
-
Simon v. EasternSearch
-
Ky. Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U. S. 26 , 40, n. 20 (1976), quoting Warth v. SeldinSearch
-
Lujan v. DefendersSearch
-
inadequate basis for a conclusion of systemwide violation and imposition of systemwide relief. See Dayton Bd. of Ed. v. BrinkmanSearch
-
Blum v. YaretSearch
-
but we did not disturb the class definition. See 457 U. S., at 997, n. 11, 999-1002. 360 Califano v. YamasakiSearch
-
decree imposed 361 III There are further reasons why the order here cannot stand. We held in Turner v. SafleySearch
-
Ibid. (citation omitted), quoting Jones v. NorthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial