Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Anderson Vs. Edwards

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 18, 1995

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 5 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Shea Vs. Vialpando US Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1974
  2. Edwards Vs. Healy US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1975
  3. Van Lare Vs. Hurley US Supreme Court · May 19, 1975
  4. Bowen Vs. Gilliard US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1987
  5. Lyng Vs. Payne US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1986
  6. October Term, 1994 Syllabus Anderson, Director, California Department of Social Services, Et Al. V. Edwards
    Search
  7. In light of the great latitude that States have in administering their AFDC programs, see, e. g., Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  8. the AU for the purpose of determining the amount of the AU's assistance. See 42 Fed. Reg. 6583-6584, and, e. g., King v. Smith
    Search
  9. a)(1)(vii) (1993). See generally Bowen v. Gilliard
    Search
  10. in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment in No. CV-S 911473 (ED Cal.), p. 7 (Feb. 13,1992). Cf. Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  11. reproducing similar Maryland schedule.) The current schedule is set forth in 148 See, e. g., Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  12. found the California Rule indistinguishable in relevant respects from the Washington regulation invalidated in Beaton v. Thompson
    Search
  13. a)(2)(viii), 233.20(a)(3)(ii)(D), and 233.90(a)(1) 3 See Bray v. Dowling
    Search
  14. Wilkes v. Gomez
    Search
  15. MacInnes v. Commissioner
    Search
  16. Morrell v. Flaherty
    Search
  17. is simply recognizing the economies of scale that inhere in such living arrangements. See, e. g., Bowen v. Gilliard
    Search
  18. quoting Termini v. Califano
    Search
  19. were adopted to implement our decisions in three AFDC cases. See 42 Fed. Reg. 6583-6584 (1977) (citing King v. Smith
    Search
  20. Lewis v. Martin
    Search
  21. Accord, Bray v. Dowling
    Search
  22. application of the rule (in concert with another statute or regulation) violated federal law. See United States v. Salerno
    Search
  23. in New York State Dept. of Social Servs. v. Dublino
    Search
  24. Wilder v. Virginia
    Search
  25. reached the same conclusion, we have no occasion to decide whether we must defer to the agency's position. Cf. Martin v. Occupational
    Search
  26. quoting Lyng v. Payne
    Search
  27. Syllabus Anderson, Director, California Department of Social Services, Et Al. V. Edwards
    Search
  28. Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  29. King v. Smith
    Search
  30. Cf. Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  31. Beaton v. Thompson
    Search
  32. See Bray v. Dowling
    Search
  33. Termini v. Califano
    Search
  34. See United States v. Salerno
    Search
  35. New York State Dept. of Social Servs. v. Dublino
    Search
  36. Cf. Martin v. Occupational
    Search
  37. Heckler v. Turner
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial