Citation network
Anderson Vs. Edwards
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 18, 1995
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
October Term, 1994 Syllabus Anderson, Director, California Department of Social Services, Et Al. V. EdwardsSearch
-
In light of the great latitude that States have in administering their AFDC programs, see, e. g., Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
the AU for the purpose of determining the amount of the AU's assistance. See 42 Fed. Reg. 6583-6584, and, e. g., King v. SmithSearch
-
a)(1)(vii) (1993). See generally Bowen v. GilliardSearch
-
in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment in No. CV-S 911473 (ED Cal.), p. 7 (Feb. 13,1992). Cf. Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
reproducing similar Maryland schedule.) The current schedule is set forth in 148 See, e. g., Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
found the California Rule indistinguishable in relevant respects from the Washington regulation invalidated in Beaton v. ThompsonSearch
-
a)(2)(viii), 233.20(a)(3)(ii)(D), and 233.90(a)(1) 3 See Bray v. DowlingSearch
-
Wilkes v. GomezSearch
-
MacInnes v. CommissionerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Morrell v. FlahertySearch
-
is simply recognizing the economies of scale that inhere in such living arrangements. See, e. g., Bowen v. GilliardSearch
-
quoting Termini v. CalifanoSearch
-
were adopted to implement our decisions in three AFDC cases. See 42 Fed. Reg. 6583-6584 (1977) (citing King v. SmithSearch
-
Lewis v. MartinSearch
-
Accord, Bray v. DowlingSearch
-
application of the rule (in concert with another statute or regulation) violated federal law. See United States v. SalernoSearch
-
in New York State Dept. of Social Servs. v. DublinoSearch
-
Wilder v. VirginiaSearch
-
reached the same conclusion, we have no occasion to decide whether we must defer to the agency's position. Cf. Martin v. OccupationalSearch
-
quoting Lyng v. PayneSearch
-
Syllabus Anderson, Director, California Department of Social Services, Et Al. V. EdwardsSearch
-
Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
King v. SmithSearch
-
Cf. Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
Beaton v. ThompsonSearch
-
See Bray v. DowlingSearch
-
Termini v. CalifanoSearch
-
See United States v. SalernoSearch
-
New York State Dept. of Social Servs. v. DublinoSearch
-
Cf. Martin v. OccupationalSearch
-
Heckler v. TurnerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial