Citation network
Swint Vs. Chambers County Comm'n
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 01, 1995
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Swint v. ChambersSearch
-
County Comm'N - 514 U.S. 35 (1995) October Term, 1994 Syllabus Swint Et Al. V. ChambersSearch
-
jury deliberations. Invoking the rule that an order denying qualified immunity is appealable before trial, Mitchell v. ForsythSearch
-
of its summary judgment motion was immediately appealable as a collateral order satisfying the test announced in Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
These legislative provisions counsel resistance to expansion of appellate jurisdiction by court decision. Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 431 U. S. 651 , 662-663, and United States v. StanleySearch
-
The three individual defendants asserted qualified immunity from suit on petitioners' federal claims. See Anderson v. CreightonSearch
-
See Monell v. NewSearch
-
Id., at 72a. Invoking the rule that an order denying qualified immunity is appealable before trial, Mitchell v. ForsythSearch
-
summary judgment motions-was immediately appealable as a collateral order satisfying the test announced in Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Digital Equipment Corp. v. DesktopSearch
-
see Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
cf. United States v. MacDonaldSearch
-
they have expressed varying views about when such jurisdiction is properly exercised. See, e. g., Roque-Rodriguez v. LemaSearch
-
Golino v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Natale v. RidgefieldSearch
-
National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. CitySearch
-
Roberson v. MullinsSearch
-
Williams v. KentuckySearch
-
United States ex rel. Valders Stone & Marble, Inc. v. C-WaySearch
-
Drake v. ScottSearch
-
TransWorld Airlines, Inc. v. AmericanSearch
-
Robinson v. VolkswagenwerkSearch
-
Stewart v. BaldwinSearch
-
Consarc Corp. v. IraqiSearch
-
cf. Swint v. WadleySearch
-
Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 431 U. S. 651 (1977), and United States v. StanleySearch
-
courts of appeals to confine review to the precise decision independently subject to appeal. See, e. g., Thornburgh v. AmericanSearch
-
Eisen v. CarlisleSearch
-
Chicago, R. 1. & P. R. Co. v. StudeSearch
-
Deckert v. IndependenceSearch
-
granting preliminary injunction also had jurisdiction to review order denying motions to dismiss). Cf. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSearch
-
Syllabus Swint Et Al. V. ChambersSearch
-
Mitchell v. ForsythSearch
-
Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
and United States v. StanleySearch
-
See Anderson v. CreightonSearch
-
Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
Roque-Rodriguez v. LemaSearch
-
Valders Stone & Marble, Inc. v. C-WaySearch
-
Swint v. WadleySearch
-
Thornburgh v. AmericanSearch
-
& P. R. Co. v. StudeSearch
-
Cf. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSearch
-
United States v. MacDonaldSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial