Citation network
First Options of Chicago, Inc. Vs. Kaplan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 22, 1995
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 938 (1995) October Term, 1994 Syllabus First Options of Chicago, Inc. V. KaplanSearch
-
merits of a dispute depends upon whether the parties agreed to arbitrate that dispute, see, e. g., Mastrobuono v. ShearsonSearch
-
evidence that they did so. See, e. g., AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. CommunicationsSearch
-
standard. See Robbins v. DaySearch
-
of the merits of a dispute depends upon whether the parties agreed to arbitrate that dispute, see, e. g., Mastrobuono v. ShearsonSearch
-
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. SolerSearch
-
courts apply when they review any other matter that parties have agreed to arbitrate. See AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. CommunicationsSearch
-
Steelworkers v. WarriorSearch
-
Allied-Bruce Terminix Coso v. DobsonSearch
-
Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. BoardSearch
-
parties objectively revealed an intent to submit the arbitrability issue to arbitration. See, e. g., Estate of Jesmer v. RohlevSearch
-
Burkett v. AllstateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration''') (quoting Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. MercurySearch
-
would have thought a judge, not an arbitrator, would decide. Ibid. See generally Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSearch
-
Kaplans might argue arbitrability to the arbitrators without losing their right to independent court review, Teamsters v. WesternSearch
-
reviewing district court decisions that confirm (but not those that set aside) arbitration awards. See, e. g., Robbins v. DaySearch
-
not upon what standard of review will more likely produce a particular substantive result. Salve Regina College v. RussellSearch
-
certain interpretations of the law that those agencies have made. See, e. g., Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
of the United States Reports. 951 MARCH 3, 1995 Miscellaneous Order No. A-643 (94-8262). LACKEY V. TEXASSearch
-
this Court. MARCH 6, 1995 Certiorari Granted-Vacated and Remanded No. 94-379. ANHEUSER-BusCH COS., INC., ET AL. V. SUMMITSearch
-
Dist. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Gustafson v. AlloydSearch
-
S. W. 2d 928. Miscellaneous Orders No. - - -. Moore, Guardian Ad Litem V. AetnaSearch
-
to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner granted. No. A-543. PLY V. WASHINGTONSearch
-
Application for bond, addressed to JUSTICE THOMAS and referred to the Court, denied. No. A-610 (94-8080). HEARN V. WELLINGTONSearch
-
Syllabus First Options of Chicago, Inc. V. KaplanSearch
-
Mastrobuono v. ShearsonSearch
-
AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. CommunicationsSearch
-
See Robbins v. DaySearch
-
See AT&T Technologies, Inc. v. CommunicationsSearch
-
Estate of Jesmer v. RohlevSearch
-
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. MercurySearch
-
Teamsters v. WesternSearch
-
Robbins v. DaySearch
-
Salve Regina College v. RussellSearch
-
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
Lackey V. TexasSearch
-
Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc., Et Al. V. SummitSearch
-
of Gustafson v. AlloydSearch
-
Moore, Guardian Ad Litem V. AetnaSearch
-
No. a-543. Ply V. WashingtonSearch
-
Hearn V. WellingtonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial