Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Celotex Corp. Vs. Edwards

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 19, 1995

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

56 entries 1 linked 55 unlinked
Show
  1. Howat Vs. Kansas US Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1922
  2. U.S. 300 (1995) October Term, 1994 Syllabus Celotex Corp. V. Edwards
    Search
  3. GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers
    Search
  4. Union of United States, Inc., 445 U. S. 375 , 386, applies to bankruptcy cases, Oriel v. Russell
    Search
  5. that such a procedure cannot be stayed by a law- 301 fully entered injunction. Board of Governors, FRS v. MCorp
    Search
  6. respondents' judgment against Celotex. Edwards v. Armstrong
    Search
  7. cases, and the sureties on the supersedeas bonds, including Northbrook. See Second Amended Complaint in Celotex Corp. v. Allstate
    Search
  8. transfers. See ibid. Celotex also 305 Celotex appealed, and the Fifth Circuit affirmed. Ed wards v. Armstrong
    Search
  9. the Section 105 Injunction was improper, the Fifth Circuit expressly disagreed with the reasoning and result of Willis v. Celotex
    Search
  10. In GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers
    Search
  11. footnote omitted). 307 This rule was applied in the bankruptcy context more than 60 years ago in Oriel v. Russell
    Search
  12. pp. 153-154 (1978). We agree with the views expressed by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins
    Search
  13. cf. Board of Governors, FRS v. MCorp
    Search
  14. in bankruptcy courts).6 Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon
    Search
  15. proceeding. 6 In attempting to strike an appropriate balance, the Third Circuit in Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins
    Search
  16. A. H. Robins Co. v. Pic-
    Search
  17. Robinson v. Michigan
    Search
  18. Home Ins. CO. v. Cooper
    Search
  19. courts may extend more broadly in the former case than in the latter. Cf. Continental Ill. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago
    Search
  20. is in accord with representative recent decisions of the Courts of Appeals. See, e. g., American Hardwoods, Inc. v. Deutsche
    Search
  21. cf. MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville
    Search
  22. denied sub nom., 485 U. S. 969 (1988).8 Respondents, relying on our decision in Board of Governors, FRS v. MCorp
    Search
  23. Walker v. Birmingham
    Search
  24. U. S. 307, 314 (1967) (quoting Howat v. Kansas
    Search
  25. but did not expressly enjoin the Edwards from proceeding against Northbrook. See Edwards v. Armstrong
    Search
  26. B. R., at 483, quoting A. H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin
    Search
  27. the majority, ante, at 308-309, n. 6, that the facts of this case do not require us to resolve whether Pacor v. Higgins
    Search
  28. jurisdictional structure of the Bankruptcy Code reflects this Court's decision in Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon
    Search
  29. Pope v. Manville
    Search
  30. Ellis v. Consolidated
    Search
  31. are entirely consistent with my approach, and they provide at most indirect support for his order. In A. H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin
    Search
  32. affects supersedeas bonds that are concededly not property of the debtor's estate. I also note that in Willis v. Celotex
    Search
  33. and thereby to justify a bankruptcy judge's injunction that had been issued over one year earlier. Cf. Siler v. Louisville
    Search
  34. See Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon
    Search
  35. of the injunction in light of the Fourth Circuit's upholding the very injunction at issue in this case, see Willis v. Celotex
    Search
  36. modified on other grounds, 835 331 V The
    Search
  37. Inc. of Stuart, 845 F.2d 293 , 295-296 (CAll), cert. denied sub nom. First Interstate Credit Alliance v. American
    Search
  38. Syllabus Celotex Corp. V. Edwards
    Search
  39. Oriel v. Russell
    Search
  40. Board of Governors, FRS v. MCorp
    Search
  41. Celotex. Edwards v. Armstrong
    Search
  42. Celotex Corp. v. Allstate
    Search
  43. of Willis v. Celotex
    Search
  44. Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins
    Search
  45. Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon
    Search
  46. Cf. Continental Ill. Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago
    Search
  47. American Hardwoods, Inc. v. Deutsche
    Search
  48. MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville
    Search
  49. Northbrook. See Edwards v. Armstrong
    Search
  50. A. H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial