Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Purkett Vs. Elem

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 15, 1995

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 1 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. Batson Vs. Kentucky US Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1986
  2. U.S. 765 (1995) October Term, 1994 Syllabus Purkett, Superintendent, Farmington Correctional Center V. Elem
    Search
  3. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit No. 94-802. Decided May 15, 1995 Relying on Batson V. Kentucky
    Search
  4. s use of peremptory challenges to strike two black men from the jury panel, an objection arguably based on Batson v. Kentucky
    Search
  5. State v. Elem
    Search
  6. then decide (step three) whether the opponent of the strike has proved purposeful racial discrimination. Hernandez v. New
    Search
  7. regarding racial motivation rests with, and never shifts from, the opponent of the strike. Cf. St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks
    Search
  8. Batson, supra, at 98, n. 20 (quoting Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine
    Search
  9. EEOC v. Greyhound
    Search
  10. d)(8). See Marshall v. Lonberger
    Search
  11. This is the second time this Term that the Court has misused its summary reversal authority in this way. See Duncan v. Henry
    Search
  12. good faith in making individual selections.' Alexander v. Louisiana
    Search
  13. a defendant's prima facie case, the Equal Protection Clause 'would be but a vain and illusory requirement.' Norris v. Alabama
    Search
  14. the use of one-third of the prosecutor's peremptories to strike black veniremen did not require an explanation, State v. Elem
    Search
  15. noted that its analysis was consistent with both the Missouri Supreme Court's interpretation of Batson in State v. Antwine
    Search
  16. S. W. 2d 51 (1987) (en bane), and this Court's intervening opinion in Hernandez v. New
    Search
  17. U. S., at 372, and thus it specifically referred to the third step in the Batson v. Kentucky
    Search
  18. See, e. g., Jones v. Ryan
    Search
  19. State v. Henderson
    Search
  20. Whitsey v. State
    Search
  21. Jackson v. Commonwealth
    Search
  22. State v. Butler
    Search
  23. discrimination that arises when the defendant has made out a prima facie case. Cf. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine
    Search
  24. Slappy v. State
    Search
  25. Walker v. State
    Search
  26. Huntley v. State
    Search
  27. Syllabus Purkett, Superintendent, Farmington Correctional Center V. Elem
    Search
  28. Hernandez v. New
    Search
  29. Cf. St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks
    Search
  30. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine
    Search
  31. See Marshall v. Lonberger
    Search
  32. See Duncan v. Henry
    Search
  33. Alexander v. Louisiana
    Search
  34. Norris v. Alabama
    Search
  35. State v. Antwine
    Search
  36. the Batson v. Kentucky
    Search
  37. Jones v. Ryan
    Search
  38. Cf. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales