Citation network
Missouri Vs. Jenkins
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 12, 1995
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 70 (1995) October Term, 1994 Syllabus Missouri Et Al. V. JenkinsSearch
-
In this 18-year-old school desegregation litigation, see, e. g., Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
-
rejection of the State's request for a determination of partial unitary status, under Freeman v. PittsSearch
-
Together with Missouri et al. v. JenkinsSearch
-
the remedy is fairly included in the question presented for review. See this Court's Rule 14.1 and, e. g., Procunier v. NavaretteSearch
-
unlimited and may not be extended to purposes beyond the elimination of racial discrimination in public schools. Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
victims of discriminatory conduct to the position they would have occupied absent that conduct, see, e. g., Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
upon which we granted certiorari. This case has been before the same United States District Judge since 1977. Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
-
for an intradistrict violation, i. e., they had operated a segregated school system within the KCMSD. Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
see also Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
million. Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
million in capital improvements. Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
-
year. Id., at A-69 to A-75 (District Court's Order of June 17, 1992). The State contended that under Freeman v. PittsSearch
-
Milliken I, 418 U. S., at 738-740,745, and thus, it is an issue subsidiary to our ultimate inquiry. Cf. Yee v. EscondidoSearch
-
see also United States v. MendenhallSearch
-
A fortiori, far from lulling respondents into a false sense of security, our previous decision in Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
before us, and have been briefed by the parties. We turn to the questions presented. Almost 25 years ago, in Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
Three years later, in Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
nature of the desegregation remedy is to be determined by the nature and scope of the constitutional violation. Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
as the most important indicia of a racially segregated school system. Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. DowellSearch
-
U. S. 237 , 250 (1991) (quoting Green v. SchoolSearch
-
black students. 639 F. Supp., at 24, 36. 4 See also Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
KCMSD. This remedy has included an elaborate program of capital improvements, course enrichment, 5 See also Green v. SchoolSearch
-
Wright v. CouncilSearch
-
United States v. ScotlandSearch
-
cf. United States v. ScotlandSearch
-
al. 47-49.6 The lower 6 Prior to 1954, Missouri mandated segregated schools for black and white children. Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
F. Supp. 1485, 1490 (WD Mo. 1984). Immediately after the Court's decision in Brown v. BoardSearch
-
examining the cause and effect issue, the court noted that 'not only is plaintiff's evidence here blurred as to cause and v. MissouriSearch
-
with Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
see also Dayton Bd. of Ed. v. BrinkmanSearch
-
U. S. 406 , 417 (1977) (Dayton I). JUSTICE SOUTER claims that our holding effectively overrules Hills v. GautreauxSearch
-
and future KCMSD students-who have no standing to challenge segregation within the confines of the SSD's. Cf. Lujan v. DefendersSearch
-
supra, at 420.10 In reconsidering this order, the District Court should apply our three-part test from Freeman v. PittsSearch
-
Lebron v. NationalSearch
-
not lack of fair notice. Given such notice, there is no unfairness to the Court resolving the issue. Unlike Bray v. AlexandriaSearch
-
is properly presented for its decision. On the merits, the Court's resolution of the dispute comports with Hills v. GautreauxSearch
-
id., at 298. This holding follows from our judgment in Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
Milliken I, supra, at 744 (citing Swann v. CharlotteMecklenburgSearch
-
Court of Appeals expressly on these factual matters if they were indeed irrelevant. It is this reading of Hills v. Gautreaux-asSearch
-
Syllabus Missouri Et Al. V. JenkinsSearch
-
Swann v. Charlotte-MecklenburgSearch
-
the KCMSD. Jenkins v. MissouriSearch
-
Cf. Yee v. EscondidoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial