Citation network
United States Vs. Gaudin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 19, 1995
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 506 (1995) October Term, 1994 Syllabus United States V. GaudinSearch
-
a jury determination that the defendant is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged. Sullivan v. LouisianaSearch
-
sort of mixed question of law and fact that has typically been resolved by juries. See, e. g., TSC Industries, Inc. v. NorthwaySearch
-
s contention that stare decisis requires respondent's constitutional claim to be denied is rejected. Sinclair v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 279 U. S. 263 , 298, is overruled. Kungys v. UnitedSearch
-
Kungys v. UnitedSearch
-
the defendant is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubU Sullivan v. LouisianaSearch
-
question for the judge do not require the higher burden of proof. See, e. g., United States v. GribbenSearch
-
F.2d 1148 , 1151 (CA6 1985). 2We held in Williams v. FloridaSearch
-
Id., at 540-541. See also Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
requiring the jury to decide 'all the elements of a criminal offense,' e. g., Estelle v. McGuireSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
see Victor v. NebraskaSearch
-
Patterson v. NewSearch
-
Brief for United States 33 (emphasis added). The Government claims that this understanding of the jury's role daca v. OregonSearch
-
TSC Industries, Inc. v. NorthwaySearch
-
McLanahan v. UniversalSearch
-
D. Robertson ed. 1875)) (emphasis in original). Other expressions of the same principle abound. See United States v. BattisteSearch
-
jury as mere factfinder. Although each contains language discussing the jury's role as factfinder, see Sullivan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSearch
-
historical practice is relevant to what the Constitution means by such concepts as trial by jury, see Murray's Lessee v. HobokenSearch
-
and the judges reached differing results when the issue finally arose in the mid-19th century. Compare Queen v. LaveySearch
-
Car. & K. 26, 30, 175 Eng. Rep. 448, 450 (Q. B. 1850) (materiality is a jury question), Queen v. GoddardSearch
-
F. & F. 361, 175 Eng. Rep. 1096 (1861) (same), with Queen v. CourtSearch
-
Queen v. GibbonSearch
-
materiality question in this country at or near the time the Bill of Rights was adopted. The Government cites Power v. PriceSearch
-
there could be no directed verdicts for civil plaintiffs. The other early case relied upon by the Government, Steinman v. McWilliamsSearch
-
point that we have been able to find places the Government itself in opposition to its position here. In United States v. CowingSearch
-
that warrants dismissal.) See, e. g., United States v. ShinnSearch
-
United States v. SingletonSearch
-
United States v. BedgoodSearch
-
Nelson v. StateSearch
-
not arise in a context in which the defendant's right to 518 jury trial was at issue. See, e. g., Cothran v. StateSearch
-
State v. WilliamsSearch
-
State v. LewisSearch
-
People v. LemSearch
-
Thompson v. PeopleSearch
-
Barnes v. StateSearch
-
has no right to jury determination of materiality, there are cases that support the other view. See Commonwealth v. GrantSearch
-
Lawrence v. StateSearch
-
State v. SpencerSearch
-
Young v. PeopleSearch
-
of stare decisis requires that we deny respondent's constitutional claim, citing our decision in Sinclair v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief for Appellant in Sinclair v. UnitedSearch
-
Ibid. We contradicted that assumption in Deutch v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S., at 299, citing ICC v. BrimsonSearch
-
U. S. 447 , 489 (1894), and Horning v. DistrictSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial