Citation network
Miller Vs. Johnson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 1995
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 900 (1995) October Term, 1994 Syllabus Miller Et Al. V. JohnsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In Shaw v. RenoSearch
-
Together with No. 94-797, Abrams et al. v. JohnsonSearch
-
et al., and No. 94-929, United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Nor can the analysis used to assess the vote dilution claim in United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. CareySearch
-
opinion of the Court. The constitutionality of Georgia's congressional redistricting plan is at issue here. In Shaw v. RenoSearch
-
Its central mandate is racial neutrality in governmental decisionmaking. See, e. g., Loving v. VirginiaSearch
-
see also Brown v. BoardSearch
-
Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. BakkeSearch
-
see also Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSearch
-
Wygant v. JacksonSearch
-
Bd. of Ed., 476 U. S. 267 , 274, 280, and n. 6 (1986) (plurality opinion). 905 In Shaw v. RenoSearch
-
unexplainable on grounds other than race.''' Id., at 644 (quoting Arlington Heights v. MetropolitanSearch
-
see also City of Rome v. UnitedSearch
-
The preclearance mechanism applies to 906 congressional redistricting plans, see, e. g., Beer v. UnitedSearch
-
Id., at 1369, 1370. As residents of the challenged Eleventh District, all appellees had standing. See United States v. HaysSearch
-
s Eleventh District was a racial gerrymander and so a violation of the Equal Protection Clause as interpreted in Shaw v. RenoSearch
-
Court's judgment, which we granted pending the filing and disposition of the appeals in this litigation, Miller v. JohnsonSearch
-
Mobile v. BoldenSearch
-
justification, segregate citizens on the basis of race in its public parks, New Orleans City Park Improvement Assn. v. DetiegeSearch
-
U. S. 54 (1958) (per curiam), buses, Gayle v. BrowderSearch
-
U. S. 903 (1956) (per curiam), golf courses, Holmes v. AtlantaSearch
-
U. S. 879 (1955) (per curiam), beaches, Mayor of Baltimore v. DawsonSearch
-
U. S. 877 (1955) (per curiam), and schools, Brown v. BoardSearch
-
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
O'CONNOR, J., dissenting) (quoting Arizona Governing Comm.for Tax Deferred Annuity and Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSearch
-
cf. Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors of America v. JacksonvilleSearch
-
see Powers v. OhioSearch
-
recognized, is that parties may rely on evidence other than bizarreness to establish racebased districting. See Shaw v. HuntSearch
-
Hays v. LouisianaSearch
-
Arlington Heights, supra, at 266 (footnote omitted). As early as Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
and in Gomillion v. LightfootSearch
-
excepted from standard equal protection precepts be resuscitated by United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. CareySearch
-
see, e. g., Voinovich v. QuilterSearch
-
see Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySearch
-
see also Celotex Corp. v. CatrettSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial