Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Things Remembered, Inc. Vs. Petrarca

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Oct 02, 1995

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 3 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. thermtron Products, Inc. Vs. Hermansdorfer US Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1976
  2. Connecticut Nat. Bank Vs. Germain US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1992
  3. Pilot Life Ins. Co. Vs. Dedeaux US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1987
  4. U.S. 124 (1995) October Term, 1995 Syllabus Things Remembered, Inc. V. Petrarca
    Search
  5. Under Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer
    Search
  6. As we explained in Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer
    Search
  7. See Gravitt v. Southwestern
    Search
  8. cannot comfortably coexist in the bankruptcy context. We must, therefore, give effect to both. Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Germain
    Search
  9. GINSBURG joins, concurring. I join the Court's opinion but write to point out that Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer
    Search
  10. U. S. 336 (1976), has itself been limited by our later decision in Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill
    Search
  11. c) remands but not remands ordered under Cohill. See, e. g., Bogle v. Phillips
    Search
  12. Nutter v. Monongahela
    Search
  13. Rothner v. Chicago
    Search
  14. to notice want of subject-matter jurisdiction on its own motion. See, e. g., Mansfield, C. & L. M. R. Co. v. Swan
    Search
  15. earlier for district court reconsideration-any question of the court's subject-matter jurisdiction. See, e. g., Sykes v. Texas
    Search
  16. Article III the Bankruptcy Act's broad grant of jurisdiction to bankruptcy judges, see Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon
    Search
  17. the seventh amendment. This task has little but the sanction of history to recommend it and is possible only because law v. equity
    Search
  18. Hernandez v. Brakegate
    Search
  19. Ltd., 942 F.2d 1223 , 1226 (CA71991). Cf., e. g., Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson
    Search
  20. to rest reviewability vel non on the tag the trial court elects to place on its ruling. Sykes v. Texas
    Search
  21. remands, regardless of the party initiating the removal or the court from which the case is removed. Cf. Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins
    Search
  22. were courts to suppose that the lawmakers meant to enact an irrational scheme. Cf. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris
    Search
  23. internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux
    Search
  24. Deal v. United
    Search
  25. composing a coherent chapter of the Judicial Procedure part of the United States Code. Cf. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers
    Search
  26. Syllabus Things Remembered, Inc. V. Petrarca
    Search
  27. Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill
    Search
  28. Bogle v. Phillips
    Search
  29. Mansfield, C. & L. M. R. Co. v. Swan
    Search
  30. Sykes v. Texas
    Search
  31. Northern Pipeline Constr. Co. v. Marathon
    Search
  32. Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson
    Search
  33. Cf. Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins
    Search
  34. Cf. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Harris
    Search
  35. of the United States Code. Cf. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers
    Search
  36. United States v. Rice
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial