Citation network
Libretti Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 03, 1995
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Libretti v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 516 U.S. 29 (1995) October Term, 1995 Syllabus Libretti V. UnitedSearch
-
charged in an indictment and his waiver of the right to a jury determination on that charge. See, e. g., United States v. BroceSearch
-
a) and 853(a), by legislative history, and by this Court's precedents, see, e. g., Alexander v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 509 U. S. 544 , 558. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. UnitedSearch
-
not fall within the Sixth Amendment right to a jury determination of guilt or innocence, see, e. g., McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
for forfeiture of the 2 Compare United States v. ReckmeyerSearch
-
Rule 11(f) applies to forfeiture provisions in plea agreements), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 850 (1986), and United States v. RobertsSearch
-
F.2d 404 , 409 (CA7 1984) (same), cert. denied, 470 U. S. 1058 (1985), with United States v. BoatnerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
CAll 1992) (Rule 11(f) does not apply to stipulated forfeiture provisions in plea agreements), United States v. BachynskySearch
-
United States v. RobinsonSearch
-
United States v. GarrettSearch
-
United States v. ZangSearch
-
in an indictment and his waiver of the right to a jury determination on that charge. See, e. g., United States v. BroceSearch
-
McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
forfeiture as an aspect of punishment imposed following conviction of a substantive criminal offense. In Alexander v. UnitedSearch
-
Id., at 567. And in Austin v. UnitedSearch
-
F. 3d, at 528. It is true, as Libretti points out, that we said in Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. UnitedSearch
-
with respect to the amendments to Rules 7, 31, and 32, it has no bearing on the proper construction of Rule 11. Tome v. UnitedSearch
-
with the familiar Sixth Amendment right to a jury determination of guilt or innocence. See, e. g., United States v. GaudinSearch
-
right to a jury determination as to the appropriate sentence to be imposed. See, e. g., McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
codifies ... the requirements of Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
defines the limits of a court's power to enter a judgment can be traced to this Court's early precedents. In Bigelow v. ForrestSearch
-
Syllabus Libretti V. UnitedSearch
-
Alexander v. UnitedSearch
-
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. UnitedSearch
-
McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Compare United States v. ReckmeyerSearch
-
and United States v. RobertsSearch
-
United States v. BoatnerSearch
-
United States v. BachynskySearch
-
In Alexander v. UnitedSearch
-
Austin v. UnitedSearch
-
Tome v. UnitedSearch
-
of Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
In Bigelow v. ForrestSearch
-
Spaziano v. FloridaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial