Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Tuggle Vs. Netherland

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Oct 30, 1995

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 1 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Brecht Vs. Abrahamson US Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1993
  2. Court's judgment affirming the conviction and remanded for further consideration in light of the holding in Ake v. Oklahoma
    Search
  3. aggravating factor, but found that the death sentence survived based on the vileness aggravator because, under Zant v. Stephens
    Search
  4. aggravator's existence always excuses a constitutional error in the admission or exclusion of evidence. Cf. Johnson v. Mississippi
    Search
  5. F.3d 1356 , vacated and remanded. PER CURIAM. In Zant v. Stephens
    Search
  6. Tuggle v. Commonwealth
    Search
  7. Va. 99, 107, 334 S. E. 2d 838, 844 (1985), cert. denied, Tuggle v. Virginia
    Search
  8. E. 2d, at 844-845. Shortly after the Virginia Supreme Court affirmed petitioner's conviction and sentence, Tuggle v. Commonwealth
    Search
  9. Va. 493, 323 S. E. 2d 539 (1984), we held in Ake v. Oklahoma
    Search
  10. we vacated the State Supreme Court's judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of Ake. Tuggle v. Virginia
    Search
  11. Supreme Court invalidated the future dangerousness aggravating circumstance because of the Ake error. See Tuggle v. Commonwealth
    Search
  12. at 110-111, 334 S. E. 2d, at 845-846. The Court of Appeals agreed with this analysis on federal habeas review, Tuggle v. Thompson
    Search
  13. it has full discretion to impose either a death sentence or a sentence of life imprisonment. Ibid. 2 See Smith v. Procunier
    Search
  14. error in the admission or exclusion of evidence. The latter circumstance is more akin to the situation in Johnson v. Mississippi
    Search
  15. on petitioner's sentence had before it 15 evidence that should have been excluded in light of Ake v. Oklahoma
    Search
  16. as to whether the constitutional error contributed to the jury's decision to impose the sentence of death. Satterwhite v. Texas
    Search
  17. allow the Fourth Circuit to review the case under the harmless-error standard appropriate to collateral review. Brecht v. Abrahamson
    Search
  18. question, the wrong question, perhaps because it assumed that that could easily be resolved by reference to Zant v. Stephens
    Search
  19. Ake v. Oklahoma
    Search
  20. Cf. Johnson v. Mississippi
    Search
  21. PER CURIAM. In Zant v. Stephens
    Search
  22. Tuggle v. Virginia
    Search
  23. of Ake. Tuggle v. Virginia
    Search
  24. See Tuggle v. Commonwealth
    Search
  25. Tuggle v. Thompson
    Search
  26. See Smith v. Procunier
    Search
  27. Johnson v. Mississippi
    Search
  28. of Ake v. Oklahoma
    Search
  29. Satterwhite v. Texas
    Search
  30. Zant v. Stephens
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial