Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Powell Vs. Nevada

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 22, 1994

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

63 entries 10 linked 53 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Shannon US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1952
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. Vs. Shutts US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1985
  3. GersteIn Vs. Pugh US Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1975
  4. County of Riverside Vs. Mclaughlin US Supreme Court · May 13, 1991
  5. Teague Vs. Lane US Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1989
  6. Estelle Vs. Gamble US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1976
  7. Pierce Vs. Underwood US Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1988
  8. Blum Vs. Bacon US Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1982
  9. United States Vs. Ceccolini US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1978
  10. United States Vs. Crews US Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1980
  11. U.S. 79 (1994) October Term, 1993 Syllabus Powell V. Nevada
    Search
  12. of County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
    Search
  13. Griffith v. Kentucky
    Search
  14. JUSTICE GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. In Gerstein v. Pugh
    Search
  15. County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
    Search
  16. Griffith v. Kentucky
    Search
  17. confirmation of probable cause violated the Fourth Amendment under this Court's precedents. County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
    Search
  18. S. 44 (1991), the Nevada Supreme Court recognized, made specific the probable-cause promptness requirement of Gerstein v. Pugh
    Search
  19. Griffith v. Kentucky
    Search
  20. Mackey v. United
    Search
  21. Teague v. Lane
    Search
  22. Griffith v. Kentucky
    Search
  23. joins, dissenting. After concluding that the Nevada Supreme Court erred by failing to follow our decision in Griffith v. Kentucky
    Search
  24. See Vale v. Louisiana
    Search
  25. New York v. Harris
    Search
  26. Payton v. New
    Search
  27. Butz v. Glover
    Search
  28. Layne & Bowler Corp. v. Western
    Search
  29. Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  30. County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
    Search
  31. U. S. 797 , 823 (1985) (STEVENS, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). See also K mart Corp. v. Cartier
    Search
  32. that have not been briefed or argued, we regularly determine that the best course is to remand. See, e. g., Pierce v. Underwood
    Search
  33. judgment below, re- 88 spondent and its amici have properly raised a number of arguments, see Blum v. Bacon
    Search
  34. Illinois v. Krull
    Search
  35. Segura v. United
    Search
  36. New York v. Harris
    Search
  37. U. S. 14 , 17 90 (1990) (internal quotation marks omitted). See also United States v. Ceccolini
    Search
  38. Illinois v. Gates
    Search
  39. Taylor v. Alabama
    Search
  40. U. S. 687 (1982), Brown v. Illinois
    Search
  41. U. S. 590 (1975), and Dunaway v. New
    Search
  42. Cf. United States v. Montalvo-Murillo
    Search
  43. of Payton v. New
    Search
  44. Coolidge v. New
    Search
  45. Illinois v. Krull
    Search
  46. United States v. Crews
    Search
  47. Syllabus Powell V. Nevada
    Search
  48. of County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
    Search
  49. Griffith v. Kentucky
    Search
  50. of the Court. In Gerstein v. Pugh
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial