Citation network
Custis Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 28, 1994
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Custis v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 511 U.S. 485 (1994) October Term, 1993 Syllabus Custis V. UnitedSearch
-
Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
did not allow collateral attack on the predicate conviction. Pp. 490-493. (b) The right, recognized in Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 109 , and United States v. TuckerSearch
-
Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
U. S. 335 , to have appointed counsel. Since Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
See Maleng v. CookSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
and Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
in trying to determine the validity of prior sentences. Ibid., 490 quoting United States v. JonesSearch
-
Barefoot v. EstelleSearch
-
of the type specified. The stat- 1 See, e. g., United States v. PaleoSearch
-
United States v. MerrittSearch
-
United States v. McGlocklinSearch
-
United States v. GallmanSearch
-
United States v. DaySearch
-
United States v. ClawsonSearch
-
and United States v. FranklinSearch
-
Cf. Gozlon- Peretz v. UnitedSearch
-
Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 464 U. S. 16 , 23 (1983) (internal quotation marks omitted). Our decision in Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CulbertSearch
-
Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 109 (1967), and United States v. TuckerSearch
-
U. S. 443 (1972), in support of this argument. Both of these decisions relied upon our earlier decision in Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
Betts v. BradySearch
-
indigent defendant in state courts only upon a showing of special circumstances. Id., at 473. But even before Betts v. BradySearch
-
Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
Moore v. DempseySearch
-
Waley v. JohnstonSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
U. S. 45 , 68-69 (1932). Following our decision in Gideon, the Court decided Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
Burgett v. TexasSearch
-
Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
United States v. AddonizioSearch
-
U. S. 178 , 184, n. 11 (1979). We later noted in Parke v. RaleySearch
-
See Maleng v. CookSearch
-
Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial