Citation network
Dalton Vs. Specter
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 1994
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 462 (1994) October Term, 1993 Syllabus Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, Et Al. V. SpecterSearch
-
with the procedural mandates specified by Congress. The court also ruled that this Court's recent decision in Franklin v. MassaSearch
-
Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. WatermanSearch
-
of Marbury v. MadisonSearch
-
the Due Process Clause. Specter v. GarrettSearch
-
here. 467 judicial review and that the political question doctrine foreclosed judicial intervention. Specter v. GarrettSearch
-
Specter v. GarrettSearch
-
and substantive. Id., at 956-961. Shortly after the Court of Appeals issued its opinion, we decided Franklin v. MassachusettsSearch
-
of Franklin. O'Keefe v. SpecterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Specter v. GarrettSearch
-
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
hold that the decisions made pursuant to the 1990 Act are not review- 471 able under the AP A. Accord, Cohen v. RiceSearch
-
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
to close and realign bases would be lacking if the Secretary and Commission violated the procedural 4 See Specter v. GarrettSearch
-
Specter v. GarrettSearch
-
Wheeldin v. WheelerSearch
-
Bivens v. SixSearch
-
In Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Dugan v. RankSearch
-
claims, subject to judicial review 5 Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSearch
-
U. S. 388 (1935), the other case (along with Youngstown) cited in Franklin v. MassachusettsSearch
-
of the APA. See Dames & Moore v. ReganSearch
-
in question commits the decision to the discretion of the President. As we stated in Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. SouthSearch
-
Ibid. 475 In a case analogous to the present one, Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. WatermanSearch
-
United States v. GeorgeSearch
-
is not available. Respondents tell us that failure to allow judicial review here would virtually repudiate Marbury v. MadisonSearch
-
JUSTICE BLACKMUN, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I did not join the majority opinion in Franklin v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Fcc V. IttSearch
-
Bowen v. MichiganSearch
-
Syllabus Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, Et Al. V. SpecterSearch
-
Franklin v. MassaSearch
-
Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. WatermanSearch
-
of Marbury v. MadisonSearch
-
the Due Process Clause. Specter v. GarrettSearch
-
Specter v. GarrettSearch
-
Franklin v. MassachusettsSearch
-
of Franklin. O'Keefe v. SpecterSearch
-
the AP A. Accord, Cohen v. RiceSearch
-
See Specter v. GarrettSearch
-
of the APA. See Dames & Moore v. ReganSearch
-
Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. SouthSearch
-
Fcc V. IttSearch
-
Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial