Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mcfarland Vs. Scott

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 29, 1994

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 4 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Murray Vs. Giarratano US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1989
  2. Barefoot Vs. Estelle US Supreme Court · Jul 06, 1983
  3. Townsend Vs. Sain US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  4. Duckworth Vs. Eagan US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1989
  5. U.S. 849 (1994) October Term, 1993 Syllabus Mcfarland V. Scott
    Search
  6. of Texas and sentenced to death. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence, McFarland v. State
    Search
  7. not oppose the filing, but the District Court denied the stay and dismissed the skeletal petition on the merits. Gosch v. Collins
    Search
  8. No. SA-93-CA-731 (WD Tex., Sept. 15, 1993). The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed, Gosch v. Collins
    Search
  9. F.3d 20 (1993), cert. dism'd sub nom. Gosch v. Scott
    Search
  10. filed a subsequent, substantive habeas petition, which the District Court dismissed as successive and abusive. Gosch v. Collins
    Search
  11. stay, the District Court found the petition to be insufficient and denied the motion for stay on the merits. McFarland v. Collins
    Search
  12. U. S. 938. The Court later granted certiorari, 510 U. S. 989 (1993), to resolve an apparent conflict with Brown v. Vasquez
    Search
  13. Rule 2(c), and comply with this Court's doctrines of procedural default and waiver, see Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  14. and to deny a stay of execution where a habeas petition fails to raise a substantial federal claim, see Barefoot v. Estelle
    Search
  15. any petition subsequently filed by counsel could be subject to dismissal as an abuse of the writ. See McCleskey v. Zant
    Search
  16. expressly by federal statute or falls under one of two other exceptions to the Anti-Injunction Act. See Mitchum v. Foster
    Search
  17. U. S. 880 , 887-888 (1983). See also Autry v. Estelle
    Search
  18. see Townsend v. Sain
    Search
  19. Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United
    Search
  20. in the habeas statute. Cf. Miles v. Apex
    Search
  21. Jackson v. Vasquez
    Search
  22. some of the burden of providing preapplication legal assistance to indigent death-sentenced prisoners. Cf. Hill v. Lockhart
    Search
  23. b). See also Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  24. until an application for habeas relief is filed. 873 Duckworth v. Eagan
    Search
  25. Syllabus Mcfarland V. Scott
    Search
  26. McFarland v. State
    Search
  27. Gosch v. Collins
    Search
  28. Gosch v. Scott
    Search
  29. McFarland v. Collins
    Search
  30. Brown v. Vasquez
    Search
  31. Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  32. See McCleskey v. Zant
    Search
  33. the Anti-Injunction Act. See Mitchum v. Foster
    Search
  34. Cf. Miles v. Apex
    Search
  35. Cf. Hill v. Lockhart
    Search
  36. Autry v. Estelle
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial