Citation network
Heller Vs. Doe
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 22, 1993
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 312 (1993) October Term, 1992 Syllabus Heller, Secretary, Kentucky Cabinet for Human Resources V. DoeSearch
-
guardians to participate as parties does not violate due process. Consideration of the factors set out in Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
on the issues currently before this Court, we limit our discussion to the current round of the litigation. See Doe v. CowherdSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
other grounds not at issue here, 770 F. Supp. 354 (1991), and the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed, Doe v. CowherdSearch
-
scrutiny. It would be imprudent and unfair to inject a new standard at this stage in the litigation. See Tennessee v. DunlapSearch
-
Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSearch
-
FCC v. BeachSearch
-
Communications, Inc., 508 U. S. 307 , 313 (1993). See also, e. g., Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
New Orleans v. DukesSearch
-
Kadrmas v. DickinsonSearch
-
relationship between the disparity of treatment and some legitimate governmental purpose. See, e. g., Nordlinger v. HahnSearch
-
Nordlinger, supra, at 15. See also, e. g., United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. FritzSearch
-
Beach Communications, supra, at 315. See also, e. g., Vance v. BradleySearch
-
Hughes v. AlexandriaSearch
-
Locomotive Firemen v. ChicagoSearch
-
Lehnhausen v. LakeSearch
-
supra, at 485, quoting Lindsley v. NaturalSearch
-
U. S. 61 , 69-70 (1913). See also, e. g., Burlington Northern R. Co. v. FordSearch
-
applied rational-basis review in previous cases involving the mentally retarded and the mentally ill. See Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
-
adulthood). Furthermore, as we recognized in an earlier case, diagnosis of mental illness is difficult. See Addington v. TexasSearch
-
faced by the subject of the proceedings. Addington v. TexasSearch
-
IJU8TICE SOUTER suggests that this description of the function of burdens of proof is inconsistent with Addington v. TexasSearch
-
Policy v. FactSearch
-
Holt Civic Club v. TuscaloosaSearch
-
U. S. 60 , 71 (1978), quoting McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
U. S. 420 , 425 (1961). See also, e. g., McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
Kotch v. BoardSearch
-
Brief for American Psychological Association as Amicus Curiae in Washington v. HarperSearch
-
S. 307 , 309, n. 1 (1982), quoting Brief for American Psychiatric Association as Amicus Curiae in Youngberg v. RomeoSearch
-
the government acts often depend on the nature and extent of the burden or deprivation to be imposed. See Addington v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 358 (1970), whereas it requires in the latter case only clear and convincing evidence, Addington v. TexasSearch
-
Minnesota v. CloverSearch
-
Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. StateSearch
-
Bd. of Equalization of Cal., 451 U. S. 648 , 674 (1981), quoting United States v. CaroleneSearch
-
we have noted the severe difficulties inherent in psychiatric diagnosis conducted by experts in the field. Addington v. TexasSearch
-
to have chosen the least restrictive means of achieving its legislative end. San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. RodriguezSearch
-
Syllabus Heller, Secretary, Kentucky Cabinet for Human Resources V. DoeSearch
-
See Doe v. CowherdSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial