Citation network
Shalala Vs. Schaefer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 31, 1993
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 292 (1993) October Term, 1992 Syllabus Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services V. SchaeferSearch
-
a judgment. Pp. 295-297. (b) The Court's decision in Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
g). Pp. 298-300. 293 (c) Contrary to dicta in Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
set out in Texas State Teachers Assn. v. GarlandSearch
-
The District Court stayed action on Schaefer's EAJA application pending this Court's imminent ruling in Melkonyan v. SullivanSearch
-
District Court, however, found Schaefer's EAJA application timely under the controlling Circuit precedent of Welter v. SullivanSearch
-
Emphasis added.) In Melkonyan v. SullivanSearch
-
a judgment. See Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSearch
-
cf. Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSearch
-
Schaefer raises two arguments that merit further discussion. The first is based on our decision in Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
become a prevailing party until Social Security benefits are actually awarded. Reply Brief for Petitioner in Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
the decision even in part. See Brecht v. AbrahamsonSearch
-
distinction between the two types of remand had not been made in the lower court opinions in Hudson, see Hudson v. SecretarySearch
-
App. to Pet. for Cert. in Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
for the first time in the closing pages of the Secretary's reply brief, see Reply Brief for Petitioner in Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
status relied on three cases, none of which supports that proposition as applied to sentence-four remands. Hanrahan v. HamptonSearch
-
procedural ruling (the reversal on appeal of a directed verdict) during the course of the judicial proceedings. Hewitt v. HelmsSearch
-
Pet. for Cert. in Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
of course, is a judgment for the plaintiff.) And the third case cited in Hudson, Texas State Teachers Assn. v. GarlandSearch
-
sentence-four judgment reversing the Secretary's denial of benefits certainly meets this description. See also Farrar v. HobbySearch
-
See United States v. IndrelunasSearch
-
is Affirmed. JUSTICE STEVENS, with whom JUSTICE BLACKMUN joins, concurring in the judgment. In Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
id., at 889. Two Terms later, in Melkonyan v. SullivanSearch
-
Mel- 1 See, e. g., Hafner v. SullivanSearch
-
Labrie v. SecretarySearch
-
Gutierrez v. SullivanSearch
-
U. S. 617 , 630 (1990). See also Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
proceedings is known. The situation is for all intents and purposes identical to that we addressed in Hanrahan v. HamptonSearch
-
Id., at 759. More recently in Texas State Teachers Assn. v. GarlandSearch
-
meaning of the EAJA merely because a court had remanded the action to the agency for further proceedings. See Hewitt v. HelmsSearch
-
Indeed, the vast majority of the Courts of Appeals have come to this conclusion. See, e. g., Paulson v. BowenSearch
-
Swedberg v. BowenSearch
-
Brown v. SecretarySearch
-
behind the EAJA itself, Congress cannot lightly be assumed to have intended it. See Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
that statute. That sound and eminently reasonable conclusion was not undermined by our decision in Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSearch
-
Hafner v. SullivanSearch
-
while I agree with the Court's judgment in this case, I respectfully disagree with its decision to overrule Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
Syllabus Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services V. SchaeferSearch
-
Texas State Teachers Assn. v. GarlandSearch
-
of Welter v. SullivanSearch
-
In Melkonyan v. SullivanSearch
-
See Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSearch
-
See Brecht v. AbrahamsonSearch
-
Hudson v. SecretarySearch
-
Hudson, Texas State Teachers Assn. v. GarlandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial