Citation network
Darby Vs. Cisneros
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1993
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 137 (1993) October Term, 1992 Syllabus Darby Et Al. V. CisnerosSearch
-
See this note, supra, at 138. We quote the text as enacted in the Statutes at Large. See Stephan v. UnitedSearch
-
Id., at 19a. The Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed. Darby v. KempSearch
-
matter of judicial discretion. 8 The Fourth Circuit's ruling in this case appears to be consistent with Montgomery v. RumsfeldSearch
-
F.2d 250 , 253-254 (CA9 1978), and Missouri v. BowenSearch
-
F.2d 864 (CA8 1987), but is in considerable tension with United States v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
Nuclear Pollution v. UnitedSearch
-
and Gulf Oil Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. HamiltonSearch
-
U. S. 140 , 144 (1992), quoting Patsy v. BoardSearch
-
c) in other contexts. For example, in ICC v. LocomotiveSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
emphasis in original). Id., at 284-285. 146 In Bowen v. MassachusettsSearch
-
U. S., at 904, quoting Shaughnessy v. PedreiroSearch
-
In his manual on the APA, prepared in 1947, to which we have given some deference, see, e. g., Steadman v. SECSearch
-
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NaturalSearch
-
reconsideration or rehearing, the trend in pre- AP A cases was in the opposite direction. In Vandalia R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Ibid. Seven years later, in Prendergast v. NewSearch
-
Accord, Banton v. BeltSearch
-
Shortly before Congress adopted the AP A, the Court, in Levers v. AndersonSearch
-
c) as petitioners would have us interpret it. Brief for Respondents 23. Respondents rely on United States v. SingSearch
-
id., at 170. Accord, Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. RistySearch
-
Putting to one side the obvious problems with relying on postenactment legislative history, see, e. g., United States v. TexasSearch
-
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTVSearch
-
Syllabus Darby Et Al. V. CisnerosSearch
-
Large. See Stephan v. UnitedSearch
-
Darby v. KempSearch
-
Montgomery v. RumsfeldSearch
-
and Missouri v. BowenSearch
-
United States v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
Nuclear Pollution v. UnitedSearch
-
Patsy v. BoardSearch
-
ICC v. LocomotiveSearch
-
In Bowen v. MassachusettsSearch
-
In Vandalia R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Prendergast v. NewSearch
-
Levers v. AndersonSearch
-
United States v. SingSearch
-
Accord, Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. RistySearch
-
United States v. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial