Citation network
Johnson Vs. De Grandy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Oct 04, 1993
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
and Thornburg v. GinglesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Together with No. 92-593, De Grandy et al. v. JohnsonSearch
-
United States v. FloridaSearch
-
Florida's congressional districts, but that element of the litigation has been resolved separately, see De Grandy v. WetherellSearch
-
the Voting Rights Act of 1965). Five Florida counties, but not Dade County, are subject to preclearance. De Grandy v. WetherellSearch
-
than one), if SJR 2-G had not fragmented each group among several districts or packed it into just a few. De Grandy v. WetherellSearch
-
and Thornburg v. GinSearch
-
U. S. 307 , 311 (1987) (per curiam) (quoting Black v. CutterSearch
-
court gives no greater preclusive effect to a state-court judgment than the state court itself would do, Marrese v. AmericanSearch
-
s claim that the state judgment itself violates the loser's federal rights. See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
s argument takes us back to ground covered last Term in two cases challenging single-member districts. See Voinovich v. QuilterSearch
-
Id., at 40 (quoting Thornburg v. GinglesSearch
-
that racial gerrymanders have played a central role in discrimination against minority groups, see Gomillion v. LightfootSearch
-
But the assumption was erroneous, and more is required, as a review of Gingles will show. 1 Thornburg v. GinglesSearch
-
statute to reach cases in which discriminatory intent is not identified, adding new language designed to codify White v. RegesterSearch
-
In Baird v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
springs from the demonstrated ingenuity of state and local governments in hobbling minority voting power, McCain v. LybrandSearch
-
Congress thus endorsed our view in White v. RegesterSearch
-
if offset by political gerrymandering in the other half, so long as proportionality was the bottom line. But see Baird v. ConsolidatedSearch
-
Richmond v. UnitedSearch
-
b). v. ThereSearch
-
or that majority-white districts elect only white representatives, is false as an empirical matter. See Voinovich v. QuilterSearch
-
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
see also United Jewish Organizations of Wi lliams burgh, Inc. v. CareySearch
-
within the meaning of the statute. Voinovich v. QuilterSearch
-
some account of whether the number of majority-minority districts falls short of a statistical norm. Cf. Washington v. DavisSearch
-
impact relevant to allegation of intentional discrimination). Both the majority and concurring opinions in Thornburg v. GinglesSearch
-
only construe the statute, and 1029 do not purport to assess its constitutional implications. See Chisom v. RoemerSearch
-
entrench the very practices and stereotypes the Equal Protection Clause is set against. See Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCCSearch
-
and are presumed invalid. Shaw v. RenoSearch
-
see also Plessy v. FergusonSearch
-
claims were brought here, and the Court's opinion does not address any constitutional issues. Cf. Voinovich v. QuilterSearch
-
its judgment. JUSTICE THOMAS, with whom JUSTICE SCALIA joins, dissenting. For the reasons I explain in Holder v. HallSearch
-
States Reports. 1034 JUNE 13, 1994 Certiorari Granted-Vacated and Remanded No. 93-428. LIVINGSTONE V. DONAHEYSearch
-
Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Key Tronic Corp. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial