Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Fdic Vs. Meyer

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Oct 04, 1993

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

52 entries 4 linked 48 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Sherwood US Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1941
  2. United States Vs. Muniz US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1963
  3. Schweiker Vs. Chilicky US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1988
  4. Loeffler Vs. Frank US Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1988
  5. U.S. 471 (1993) October Term, 1993 Syllabus Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation V. Meyer
    Search
  6. right without due process of law in violation of the Fifth Amendment. In making this claim, he relied on Bivens v. Six
    Search
  7. means law of the State, see, e. g., Miree v. DeKalb
    Search
  8. is necessary to overcome the presumption that such a clause fully waives immunity. See, e. g., Federal Housing Admin. v. Burr
    Search
  9. International Primate Protection League v. Administrators
    Search
  10. category would not include instances of constitutional tort. The cases on which FDIC relies, Burr, supra, Loeffler v. Frank
    Search
  11. U. S. 549 , and Franchise Tax Bd. of California v. Postal
    Search
  12. JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. In Bivens v. Six
    Search
  13. law) without due process of law in violation of the Fifth Amendment. In making this claim, Meyer relied upon Bivens v. Six
    Search
  14. II Absent a waiver, sovereign immunity shields the Federal Government and its agencies from suit. Loeffler v. Frank
    Search
  15. Federal Housing Administration v. Burr
    Search
  16. U. S. 584 , 586 (1941). See also United States v. Mitchell
    Search
  17. waiver of FSLIC's immunity from suit. United States v. Nordic
    Search
  18. The Ninth Circuit affirmed this finding. 944 F. 2d, at 575-577. We declined to review this aspect of the case. Meyer v. Pattullo
    Search
  19. absence of such a definition, we construe a statutory term in accordance with its ordinary or natural meaning. Smith v. United
    Search
  20. itself liable. Richards v. United
    Search
  21. means law of the State-the source of substantive liability under the FTCA. See, e. g., Miree v. DeKalb
    Search
  22. Rayonier Inc. v. United
    Search
  23. on the waiver of sovereign immunity.6 6FDIC relies upon United States v. Smith
    Search
  24. not contain the term. We therefore find Smith unhelpful in this regard. 7 Nothing in our decision in Hubsch v. United
    Search
  25. b) mentioned above). Id., at 441. See also Hubsch v. United
    Search
  26. general rule that waivers of sovereign immunity are to be read narrowly in favor of the sovereign. See United States v. Nordic
    Search
  27. Franchise Tax Bd. of Gal. v. Postal
    Search
  28. a). See Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Germain
    Search
  29. inquiries. United States v. Mitchell
    Search
  30. of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment may be appropriate in some contexts, but not in others. Compare Davis v. Passman
    Search
  31. component of the Due Process Clause in the context of alleged gender discrimination in employment), with Schweiker v. Chilicky
    Search
  32. than its extension. It must be remembered that the purpose of Bivens is to deter the officer. See Carlson v. Green
    Search
  33. Goit Independence Joint Venture v. FSLIG
    Search
  34. are not ours to make. Ibid. (quoting United States v. Standard
    Search
  35. Syllabus Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation V. Meyer
    Search
  36. Bivens v. Six
    Search
  37. Miree v. DeKalb
    Search
  38. Federal Housing Admin. v. Burr
    Search
  39. and Franchise Tax Bd. of California v. Postal
    Search
  40. of the Court. In Bivens v. Six
    Search
  41. United States v. Mitchell
    Search
  42. United States v. Nordic
    Search
  43. Meyer v. Pattullo
    Search
  44. Smith v. United
    Search
  45. Richards v. United
    Search
  46. United States v. Smith
    Search
  47. Hubsch v. United
    Search
  48. See United States v. Nordic
    Search
  49. See Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Germain
    Search
  50. Compare Davis v. Passman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial