Citation network
Liteky Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 03, 1993
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Liteky v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 510 U.S. 540 (1993) October Term, 1993 Syllabus Liteky Et Al. V. UnitedSearch
-
doctrine. Pp. 543-556. (a) The doctrine-see United States v. GrinnellSearch
-
United States v. GrinnellSearch
-
See, e. g., Lyons v. UnitedSearch
-
Craven v. UnitedSearch
-
recusal. See, e. g., Toth v. TransSearch
-
Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. DowSearch
-
produced unsuppressible judicial animosity), the supposed doctrine would not necessarily be applied. See, e. g., Davis v. BoardSearch
-
in an opinion on the merits on some basis other than what the judge learned from his participation in the case. Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
had found recusal required on the basis of judicial remarks made in an earlier proceeding. 546 Rice v. McKenzieSearch
-
a). Most Courts of Appeals to consider the matter have rejected this contention, see United States v. BarrySearch
-
United States v. SammonsSearch
-
McWhorter v. BirminghamSearch
-
United States v. MitchellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. MerktSearch
-
Johnson v. TruebloodSearch
-
United States v. SiblaSearch
-
F.2d 864 , 869 (CA9 1980). Some, however, have agreed with it, see United States v. ChantalSearch
-
cf. United States v. CovenSearch
-
grounds, see Liljeberg v. HealthSearch
-
to extrajudicial sources, see, e. g., Craven v. UnitedSearch
-
Ferrari v. UnitedSearch
-
a), see United States v. CovenSearch
-
Panzardi-Alvarez v. UnitedSearch
-
holding was citation of our opinion almost half a century earlier in Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
doctrine. See, e. g., Davis v. BoardSearch
-
KENNEDY asserts that what we have said in this paragraph contradicts the proposition, established in Liljeberg v. HealthSearch
-
First, judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion. See United States v. GrinnellSearch
-
and perhaps of the former as well) is the statement that was alleged to have been made by the District Judge in Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
by holding-contrary to our most recent interpretation of the statute in Liljeberg v. HealthSearch
-
ensure that one side or the other shall prevail, there can be little doubt that he or she must recuse. Cf. Rugenstein v. OttenheimerSearch
-
little justification for its announcement of the extrajudicial source rule, relying only upon a citation to Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
opinions or predispositions arising from outside the courtroom need not be disqualifying. See, e. g., United States v. ConforteSearch
-
based upon matters disclosed at trial may rise to the level where recusal is required. See, e. g., United States v. HollandSearch
-
Nicodemus v. ChryslerSearch
-
United States v. ChantalSearch
-
judge hear the case. 565 In matters of ethics, appearance and reality often converge as one. See Offutt v. UnitedSearch
-
and neutrality can obtain if the bare possibility of a fair hearing is all that the law requires. Cf. Marshall v. JerricoSearch
-
feeling, so important to a popular government, that justice has been done''') (quoting Joint AntiFascist Refugee Comm. v. McGrathSearch
-
a) and (b) in Liljeberg v. HealthSearch
-
supra, at 860. Because the appearance of partiality may arise when in fact there is none, see, e. g., Hall v. SmallSearch
-
United States v. RitterSearch
-
Syllabus Liteky Et Al. V. UnitedSearch
-
Lyons v. UnitedSearch
-
Toth v. TransSearch
-
Davis v. BoardSearch
-
Berger v. UnitedSearch
-
Rice v. McKenzieSearch
-
United States v. BarrySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial