Citation network
Staples Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 30, 1993
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Staples v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 511 U.S. 600 (1993) October Term, 1993 Syllabus Staples V. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BalintSearch
-
fine. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Relying on its decision in United States v. MittleiderSearch
-
Liparota v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. HudsonSearch
-
Liparota, supra, at 423. The language of the statute, the starting place in our inquiry, see Connecticut Nat. Bank v. GermainSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Morissette v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. United States v. DotterweichSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Cf. United States v. InternationalSearch
-
United States v. InternationalSearch
-
in the ordinary sense of the term. The Government seeks support for its position from our decision in United States v. FreedSearch
-
U. S. 277 , 281 (1943), and have described them as strict liability crimes, United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Queen v. TolsonSearch
-
United States v. BalintSearch
-
Sipes v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Act. Cf. United States v. AndersonSearch
-
See United States v. HerbertSearch
-
Cf. United States v. BalintSearch
-
Commonwealth v. RaymondSearch
-
Commonwealth v. FarrenSearch
-
People v. SnowSearch
-
Queen v. WoodrowSearch
-
Hobbs v. WinchesterSearch
-
Tenement House Dept. v. McDevittSearch
-
Price v. SheffieldSearch
-
penalties commonly are relatively small, and conviction does no grave damage to an 13 Cf. Queen v. TolsonSearch
-
State v. LindbergSearch
-
United States v. BalintSearch
-
Cf. Holdridge v. UnitedSearch
-
Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 508 U. S. 223 , 239 (1993) (quoting United States v. BassSearch
-
U. S. 336 , 347 (1971), in turn quoting United States v. FisherSearch
-
Chapman v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BalintSearch
-
Cf. United States v. HarrisSearch
-
Liparota v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
States Gypsum Co., 438 U. S. 422 , 437-438 (1978).1 Thus, our holding in United States v. FreedSearch
-
Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. HarrisSearch
-
See United States v. O'MaraSearch
-
United States v. AndersonSearch
-
Cf. United States v. BalintSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial