Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Norman Vs. Reed

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 14, 1992

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 3 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Moore Vs. Ogilvie US Supreme Court · May 05, 1969
  2. Williams Vs. Rhodes US Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1968
  3. Jenness Vs. Fortson US Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1971
  4. U.S. 279 (1992) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Norman Et Al. V. Reed
    Search
  5. Together with No. 90-1435, Cook County Officers Electoral Board et al. v. Reed
    Search
  6. all voters' opportunities to express their own political preferences. See, e. g., Illinois Ed. of Elections v. Socialist
    Search
  7. the county as they would need if they wished to field candidates for statewide office. See Illinois Ed. of Elections v. Socialist
    Search
  8. ends, thus enlarging the opportunities of all voters to express their own political preferences. See Anderson v. Celebrezze
    Search
  9. Illinois Bd. of Elections v. Socialist
    Search
  10. to the ballot, we have called for the demonstration of a corresponding interest sufficiently 8 As in Anderson v. Celebrezze
    Search
  11. the organizers of a new party must gather to field candidates in local elections. In Illinois Bd. of Elections v. Socialist
    Search
  12. of the component districts while maintaining the total 294 signature requirement at 25,000. But cf. Moore v. Ogilvie
    Search
  13. Communist Party of Illinois v. State
    Search
  14. Reed has adduced no justification for the disparity here.10 IOTo an extent, history explains the anomaly. Moore v. Ogilvie
    Search
  15. U. S. 814 (1969), together with the Seventh Circuit's decision in Commu nist Party of Illinois v. State
    Search
  16. ballot. These were the same legal developments, in fact, that led to the anomaly at issue in Illinois Ed. of Elections v. Socialist
    Search
  17. Board in No. 90-1126, p. 9, and n. 7, a considerably more lenient restriction than the one we upheld in Jenness v. Fortson
    Search
  18. ll We therefore remand these cases to that court for its prompt resolution of this issue. See Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias
    Search
  19. see also McCluney v. Jos
    Search
  20. as nonjudicial offices within Cook County. That court might also construe the decision in Anderson v. Schneider
    Search
  21. application of our decision invalidating a previous version of the Illinois election law, Illinois Bd. of Elections v. Socialist
    Search
  22. Syllabus Norman Et Al. V. Reed
    Search
  23. Illinois Ed. of Elections v. Socialist
    Search
  24. See Illinois Ed. of Elections v. Socialist
    Search
  25. See Anderson v. Celebrezze
    Search
  26. Anderson v. Celebrezze
    Search
  27. In Illinois Bd. of Elections v. Socialist
    Search
  28. Party of Illinois v. State
    Search
  29. See Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias
    Search
  30. McCluney v. Jos
    Search
  31. Anderson v. Schneider
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial