Citation network
United States Vs. Wilson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 15, 1992
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 329 (1992) October Term, 1991 Syllabus United States V. WilsonSearch
-
s determination, the sentencing court did not participate in computation of the credit. See, e. g., United States v. MorganSearch
-
Congress' use of a verb tense is significant in construing statutes. See, e. g., OUe v. UnitedSearch
-
Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. ChesapeakeSearch
-
of the statute would make the award of credit arbitrary, a result not to be presumed lightly. See United States v. TurketteSearch
-
meaning of a statute somewhat difficult to ascertain. See, e. g., E. 1. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. TrainSearch
-
Gladstone, Realtors v. VillageSearch
-
see also United States v. LucasSearch
-
able to seek judicial review of these computations after exhausting their administrative remedies, see United States v. BaylessSearch
-
United States v. FlanaganSearch
-
Robertson v. RailroadSearch
-
that, when Congress alters the words of a statute, it must intend to change the statute's meaning. See Rus sello v. UnitedSearch
-
remedial statute is not supported by the text, legislative history, or underlying policies of the statute. In Crandon v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
was subject to judicial review after the prisoner exhausted his administrative remedies. See Chua Han Mow v. UnitedSearch
-
to another sentence. See, e. g., United States v. BestonSearch
-
United States v. ChalkerSearch
-
the Sixth Circuit where this case arose-did not authorize a credit for time spent in state custody. See United States v. BlankenshipSearch
-
ed.) governed credit for presentence time spent in official detention. 7 See also United States v. Garcia-GutierrezSearch
-
and therefore released him from custody, it would be bizarre to conclude that ment officials. United States v. Garcia-GutierrezSearch
-
United States v. HarrisSearch
-
federal detainer must be the exclusive reason a prisoner in state custody has not been released on bail. United States V. BlankenshipSearch
-
the decision to award jail credit include the Ninth Circuit and the Eighth Circuit. See, e. g., United States v. ChalkerSearch
-
United States v. BestonSearch
-
is one such issue. It is also an issue on which the Courts of Appeals are currently divided. For example, in Moreland V. UnitedSearch
-
however, in United States V. InsleySearch
-
tends to support the conclusion that the changes in language were deliberate and should not be ignored. See Union Bank v. WolasSearch
-
United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. FritzSearch
-
in Ramsey v. BrennanSearch
-
Circuit would not credit the time that Ramsey spent in a halfway house while awaiting trial, and in United States v. WoodsSearch
-
Syllabus United States V. WilsonSearch
-
United States v. MorganSearch
-
OUe v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. TurketteSearch
-
Nemours & Co. v. TrainSearch
-
United States v. LucasSearch
-
United States v. BaylessSearch
-
In Crandon v. UnitedSearch
-
See Chua Han Mow v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. BlankenshipSearch
-
United States v. Garcia-GutierrezSearch
-
United States v. BlankenshipSearch
-
Moreland v. UnitedSearch
-
See Union Bank v. WolasSearch
-
Ramsey v. BrennanSearch
-
United States v. MartinezSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial