Citation network
Dewsnup Vs. Timm
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 15, 1992
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 410 (1992) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Dewsnup V. TimmSearch
-
Because the result reached by the Court of Appeals was at odds with that reached by the Third Circuit in Gaglia v. FirstSearch
-
on real property passed through bankruptcy unaffected. This Court recently acknowledged that this was so. See Farrey v. SanderfootSearch
-
Johnson v. HomeSearch
-
p. 771 (14th ed. 1978) (emphasis in original). The alteration had no substantive effect. Oppenheimer v. OldhamSearch
-
s lien for any reason other than payment on the debt. Our cases reveal the Court's concern about this. In Long v. BullardSearch
-
the debtor from the lien of a mortgage created by him before the bankruptcy. And in Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSearch
-
See Emil v. HanleySearch
-
that is not the subject of at least some discussion in the legislative history. See United Savings Assn. of Texas v. TimbersSearch
-
of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd., 484 U. S. 365 , 380 (1988). See also Pennsylvania Dept. of Public Welfare v. DavenportSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. RonSearch
-
identical words used in different parts of the same act are intended to have the same meaning.'''''' Sullivan v. StroopSearch
-
U. S. 478 , 484 (1990) (quoting Sorenson v. SecretarySearch
-
of Treasury, 475 U. S. 851 , 860 (1986) (quoting Helvering v. StockholmsSearch
-
Enskilda Bank, 293 U. S. 84 , 87 (1934) (quoting Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
An unnatural meaning should be disfavored at any time, but particularly when it produces a redundancy. See Montclair v. RamsdellSearch
-
Wilson v. CommonwealthSearch
-
a) (listing two exceptions to Chapter 13 discharge). Compare, e. g., Kelly v. RobinsonSearch
-
obligations imposed in criminal judgments nondischargeable in Chapter 7) with Pennsylvania Dept. of Public Welfare v. DavenportSearch
-
textual footing, we will not presume a departure from longstanding pre-Code practice. See, e. g., Midlantic Nat. Bank v. NewSearch
-
to alter pre-Code regimes, Pennsylvania Dept. of Public Welfare v. DavenportSearch
-
s opinion is at odds with our jurisprudence, one need only examine our most recent bankruptcy decision. Union Bank v. WolasSearch
-
It is even more instructive to compare today's opinion with our decision a few years ago in United States v. RonSearch
-
Syllabus Dewsnup V. TimmSearch
-
Gaglia v. FirstSearch
-
See Farrey v. SanderfootSearch
-
Oppenheimer v. OldhamSearch
-
In Long v. BullardSearch
-
See United Savings Assn. of Texas v. TimbersSearch
-
Pennsylvania Dept. of Public Welfare v. DavenportSearch
-
Sorenson v. SecretarySearch
-
Helvering v. StockholmsSearch
-
Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
See Montclair v. RamsdellSearch
-
Midlantic Nat. Bank v. NewSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial