Citation network
United States Vs. Williams
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 22, 1992
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 36 (1992) October Term, 1991 Syllabus United States V. WilliamsSearch
-
The Court will not review a question that was neither pressed nor passed on below, see, e. g., Stevens v. DepartmentSearch
-
Court granted Williams' motion for disclosure of all exculpatory portions of the grand jury transcripts. See Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
that the Government had failed to fulfill its obligation under the Tenth Circuit's prior decision in United States v. PageSearch
-
App. to Pet. for Cert. 23a-24a (quoting United States v. GraySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Id., at 903 (quoting Bank of Nova Scotia v. UnitedSearch
-
no doubt that we have jurisdiction to entertain the case) to reverse course at this late stage. See, e. g., Ferguson v. Moore-McCormackSearch
-
Stevens v. DepartmentSearch
-
Springfield v. KibbeSearch
-
exists here. 4 Relying upon, and to some extent repeating, the reasoning of its earlier holding in United States v. PageSearch
-
McGoldrick v. CompagnieSearch
-
the state court of an opportunity to rest its decision on an adequate and independent state ground. See Illinois v. GatesSearch
-
see also Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. CrenshawSearch
-
U. S. 71 , 79-80 (1988). But cf. Cohen v. CowlesSearch
-
a similar rule (indeed, a rule even more broadly cast) to the disadvantage of the United States, see Stevens v. DepartmentSearch
-
principle it expresses, deal strictly with the courts' power to control their own procedures. See, e. g., Jencks v. UnitedSearch
-
McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
That power has been applied not only to improve the truthfinding process of the trial, see, e. g., Mesarosh v. UnitedSearch
-
rules (imposed by the Constitution or laws) governing matters apart from the trial itself, see, e. g., Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 232 U. S. 383 (1914). Thus, Bank of Nova Scotia v. UnitedSearch
-
see generally United States v. SellsSearch
-
criminalizing subornation of perjury). That some of the misconduct alleged in Bank of Nova Scotia v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ChanenSearch
-
F.2d 1306 , 1312 (CA9) (quoting Nixon v. SiricaSearch
-
institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people. See Stirone v. UnitedSearch
-
the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. See United States v. CalandraSearch
-
Enterprises, Inc., 498 U. S. 292 , 297 (1991) (quoting United States v. MortonSearch
-
it is investigating. Blair v. UnitedSearch
-
the production of evidence, and must appeal to the court when such compulsion is required. See, e. g., Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
when the compulsion the grand jury seeks would override rights accorded by the Constitution, see, e. g., Gravel v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ThompsonSearch
-
is summoned to appear before a grand jury, even if he is the subject of the investigation. See United States v. MandujanoSearch
-
against self-incrimination, Calandra, supra, at 346 (citing Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
see Lawn v. UnitedSearch
-
process, but we have refused them all, including some more appealing than the one presented today. In United States v. CalandraSearch
-
U. S., at 349. In Costello v. UnitedSearch
-
a very limited one, not remotely comparable to the power they maintain over their own proceedings. See United States v. ChanenSearch
-
relationships between the prosecutor, the constituting court, and the grand jury itself. Cf., e. g., United States v. PaynerSearch
-
Wood v. GeorgiaSearch
-
who may be justly accused and shielding the innocent from unfounded accusation and prosecution. See, e. g., Stirone v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial