Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lechmere, Inc. Vs. Nlrb

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 27, 1992

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

77 entries 3 linked 74 unlinked
Show
  1. Central Hardware Co. Vs. Nlrb US Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1972
  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. Vs. Nlrb US Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1941
  3. Buckley Vs. Fitzsimmons US Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1993
  4. U.S. 527 (1992) October Term, 1991 Syllabus Lechmere, Inc. V. National
    Search
  5. organizers. Thus, as a rule, an employer cannot be compelled to allow nonemployee organizers onto his property. NLRB v. Babcock
    Search
  6. Babcock's holding was neither repudiated nor modified by this Court's decisions in Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  7. S. 539 , and Hudgens v. 528 Syllabus NLRB, 424 U. S. 507 . See also Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Carpenters
    Search
  8. terms, thus, the NLRA confers rights only on employees, not on unions or their nonemployee organizers. In NLRB v. Babcock
    Search
  9. Id., at 486-487. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit refused to enforce the Board's order, NLRB v. Babcock
    Search
  10. U. S., at 111-112 (quoting NLRB v. Stowe
    Search
  11. U. S., at 113 (emphasis added) (citing Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  12. the ensuing decades, we have described it in cases arising in related contexts. Two such cases, Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  13. U. S. 539 (1972), and Hudgens v. NLRB
    Search
  14. union supporters on employer-owned property. The principal issue in both cases was whether, based upon Food Employees v. Logan
    Search
  15. law, it should have been laid to rest by 535 Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Carpenters
    Search
  16. Ibid. (quoting Electrical Workers v. NLRB
    Search
  17. NLRB v. Erie
    Search
  18. see also Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  19. to judicial deference when it interprets an ambiguous provision of a statute that it administers. See, e. g., NLRB v. Food
    Search
  20. cf. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  21. Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary
    Search
  22. see also NLRB v. Brown
    Search
  23. U. S., at 113 (emphasis added). Classic examples include logging camps, see NLRB v. Lake
    Search
  24. and mountain resort hotels, see NLRB v. S &
    Search
  25. NLRB v. Curtin
    Search
  26. of the rule, if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, must be enforced. Beth Israel Hospital v. NLRB
    Search
  27. U. S. 483 , 501 (1978). In NLRB v. Babcock
    Search
  28. repeatedly reaffirmed that the standard is a neutral and flexible rule of accommodation. In Central Hardware Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  29. language. Hudgens v. NLRB
    Search
  30. In Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Carpenters
    Search
  31. of deference to an administrative agency charged with administering a statute. See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  32. reworked that rule in the manner of Jean Country, we would also accept the Board's change of mind. See NLRB v. Curtin
    Search
  33. ante, at 539, but for rationality and consistency with the statute. Litton Financial Printing Div. v. NLRB
    Search
  34. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  35. NLRB v. Financial
    Search
  36. Court of Appeals enforcing the Board's order. I agree with JUSTICE WHITE that the Court's strict construction of NLRB v. Babcock
    Search
  37. Wilcox Co., 351 U. S. 105 (1956), is not consistent with Hudgens v. NLRB
    Search
  38. of the United States Reports. 550 OCTOBER 7, 1991 Dismissal Under Rule 46 No. 91-64. ESTELLE, WARDEN V. WASKO
    Search
  39. F.2d 910 . Certiorari Granted-Vacated and Remanded No. 90-1639. UNITED STATES V. WIDDOWSON
    Search
  40. C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Touby v. United
    Search
  41. F.2d 587 . No. 90-1853. Nationwide Corp. Et Al. V. Howing
    Search
  42. granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg
    Search
  43. F.2d 263 . No. 90-1864. New York State Department of Health V. Andrulonis
    Search
  44. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Gaubert
    Search
  45. F.2d 1210 . No. 90-1936. Parker Solvents Co., Inc. V. Royal
    Search
  46. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Salve Regina College v. Russell
    Search
  47. F.2d 185 . No. 90-7574. Buckley V. Fitzsimmons
    Search
  48. Syllabus Lechmere, Inc. V. National
    Search
  49. NLRB v. Babcock
    Search
  50. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Carpenters
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial